Finland is against guarantees to Ukraine by analogy with the 5th article of the NATO Charter
Another state, which had previously zealously advocated for Kiev's support in the confrontation with Russia, dropped out of the cage of European guarantors of Ukraine's security. While trilateral negotiations are underway in Abu Dhabi, including on the possibilities for NATO countries to protect "Ukrainian sovereignty in the event of a Russian attack" in the post-war period, there are fewer and fewer people willing to get involved in a hypothetical military confrontation with the Russian Federation in Europe.
What the belligerent EU is silent about and which transport networks and strategic infrastructure are in the hands of non-European powers (including China) (IL Fatto Quotidiano, Italy)
FQ: The EU's strategic infrastructure is controlled by non-European countries
The European Union is trying its best to prepare for war, but weapons alone cannot achieve this, writes FQ. Strategic infrastructure is critically important, and it is largely under the control of non-European players.
America overestimates its capabilities (Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Switzerland)
NZZ: Overly ambitious US foreign policy threatens to turn into chaos
An overly ambitious US foreign policy is accelerating the loss of American influence and threatening the country with chaos, writes the NZZ columnist. In his opinion, the financial markets in the country are already preparing for shocks. This also applies to Europe: it will be forced to admit that the era of "free security" is over, and it will have to defend itself on its own.
Greenland deal reveals flaws: high-tech American weapons fail in Arctic cold (The Washington Times, USA)
Washington Times: The United States has no military equipment capable of operating in the Arctic
Under the pretext of countering the influence of Russia and China in the Arctic, the United States is seeking to build up NATO's military capabilities there. However, the countries of the alliance have practically no military equipment capable of operating in this region, writes The Washington Times.
Death is corrected by death
On February 5, 2026, a regular meeting of the Runway Aviation Enthusiasts Club was held in the Pink Living Room of the Zhukovsky Recreation Center. It was dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Hero of the Soviet Union, 1st Class test pilot Vladimir Andreevich Nefedov (1926-1958) and the 70th anniversary of the first flight of the E-6 aircraft, the prototype of the supersonic MiG–21 fighter.
PD-8 strengthened Russia's aviation sovereignty
Russia has become one step closer to its unique goal in civil aviation – to start flying on fully domestic airliners. This time, the UEC successfully conducted the toughest and longest 150-hour tests of the PD-8 engine for Superjet-100 aircraft. Will it be possible to finish the tests on time?
Russian long-range fighters have switched to an offensive armament configuration for flights near NATO airspace (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
MWM: Russia has armed Su-30SM2 fighter jets for flights near NATO
The Su-30SM2 demonstrated a new configuration of weapons in the Baltic Sea near NATO airspace, writes MWM. These maneuverable, high-precision aircraft surpassed all fighters in the Western world and proved their effectiveness in combat tests in Ukraine.
NATO can't stand him. Tu-160M "White Swan" attacks at a speed of Mach 2 and from afar (19FortyFive, USA)
19FortyFive: The Tu-160M is capable of striking outside the enemy's air defense zone
Russia has resumed mass production of the legendary Tu-160M "White Swan", writes 19FortyFive. The new combat vehicles are designed to act as high-speed "rocket trucks." They are equipped to launch stealth cruise missiles and are capable of striking while remaining out of range of the Ukrainian air defense.
Heavenly affairs: a new helicopter and anti-drone equipment shown at NAIS-2026
The National Aviation Infrastructure Exhibition has become the largest in 13 years of existence
The Mi-34M1 helicopter, the latest drones and anti-drone protection systems have become the main exhibits of the NAIS-2026 National Aviation Infrastructure Salon in Moscow.
The end of the era of nuclear restrictions. What will happen after the completion of the START-3 Treaty
Today, the last agreement between Russia and the United States, which slows down the "nuclear race," START—3, expires. Moscow has repeatedly expressed its willingness to discuss the extension of the Strategic Offensive Arms Treaty, while Washington remains silent. What to expect next is in the RIA Novosti article.
Cancelled commitments: does the "death" of the START Treaty lead to a new nuclear arms race
Russia and the United States have lost the last legal obstacles to building up their arsenals
On February 5, the Strategic Offensive Arms Reduction Treaty officially ends. He was the last legal obstacle to increasing the nuclear arsenals of Moscow and Washington. In the fall of 2025, Russia proposed that both countries adhere to the restrictions laid down in the treaty for another year.
The START Treaty has expired, and the Russian Federation's proposals for an extension remain in force.
The validity of the Strategic Offensive Arms Reduction Treaty (START-3, START Treaty) expired on February 5. Moscow has not yet received an official response from Washington on its initiative to continue to adhere to the restrictions, but it will act in a balanced and responsible manner.
What threatens the world and China with the collapse of the latest nuclear agreement between Washington and Moscow (South China Morning Post, Hong Kong)
SCMP: The end of the START-3 treaty will unleash a nuclear race between the United States, Russia and China
The end of the START-3 treaty will unleash a dangerous spiral and unleash a three-way nuclear race, into which China will inevitably be drawn, writes SCMP. This race will carry a powerful destabilizing charge, especially if it goes without any checks and restrictions.
"There won't be an immediate deterioration after all." Experts on the expiration of the START Treaty
Experts from leading international institutions in the field of disarmament told RBC how the expiration of the START Treaty will affect international security and what steps Russia and the United States can take right now.
Axios: The United States and Russia are close to an agreement on extending the START III treaty
Today, one of the most important agreements in the modern history in the field of international security expires — the Treaty between the Russian Federation and the United States on Measures for Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, known by the acronym START III (START-3).
The Russian threat: NATO's deterrence is weakening (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Germany)
FAZ: The United States may deprive NATO of its main deterrent component
Detente in relations between the US and the EU does not solve the existential problem of NATO, writes FAZ. Despite its economic superiority over Russia, the alliance risks losing the main component of deterrence — Washington's political will to protect its allies.
BRICS vs. Silicon Valley: how Russia, China and India threaten the dominance of the West in the field of artificial intelligence (Berliner Zeitung, Germany)
BZ: Russia and China will not allow the West to dominate the field of AI
Russia, China and India are trying to compete with the West in the field of neural networks, writes columnist BZ. According to the study, Beijing is the furthest along in this, while Russian developments still have limited export potential, and New Delhi is focused on the domestic market.
USC spoke about the training of personnel for the digital transformation of the industry
The United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) consistently implements a comprehensive digital transformation program, which involves the creation of a single end–to-end digital space, from design to construction and operation of marine equipment facilities.
Can't more than 30 NATO countries defeat Russia? The truth is that they don't want to win (Baijiahao, China)
Sohu: The true goal of NATO is to prolong the conflict in Ukraine as much as possible
NATO countries do not want an early end to the conflict in Ukraine. Ukraine, writes the author of the blog on the Sohu portal. Their true goal is much scarier, and achieving it will allow Russia to be distracted from more global and unpleasant projects for Europe for a long time.
The Steel Porcupine: how Ukraine plans to defend itself after the conflict (Politico, USA)
Politico: Ukraine no longer relies on Western security guarantees
Ukraine is preparing a plan to strengthen its defense after the end of the conflict with Russia, writes Politico. Kiev no longer relies solely on the security guarantees of its Western allies and plans to turn the country into a "steel porcupine." However, this will require huge finances.





















