Войти

The Times: Britain risks ceding France the title of the leading NATO military power in Europe

1978
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

France and Great Britain have been fighting for a leading role in Europe for hundreds of years and the residue from this struggle remains today.

According to the British newspaper The Times, soon the French army may be the strongest on the European continent, pushing the British army into second place.

Britain risks ceding France the title of the leading NATO military power in Europe

— the publication notes, referring to the data of the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

The newspaper writes that this may happen, despite the fact that the UK spends significantly more on defense than France. According to the Times, the British defense budget last year exceeded the French defense spending by a huge amount of 13 billion pounds.

However, the British newspaper notes, the French armed forces still have a number of advantages – they have more military personnel (about 200,000 against the British 150,000), frigates, aircraft, and France can launch nuclear missiles from submarines and airplanes. At the same time, France is inferior to the UK in the number of tanks and aircraft carriers, writes the Times. For reference, France has 1 aircraft carrier, and the UK has 2 of them, although technical problems are not solved with one of them.

Great Britain and France are the two European members of NATO with nuclear weapons. Recall that France has been a member of NATO since 1949, and in 1966 the country withdrew from the military structure of the alliance and returned to it only in 2009.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.03 17:30
  • 13
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 21.03 15:59
  • 730
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 19.03 11:57
  • 1
Persuasion Strike: Contrary to US statements, Iran continues to attack
  • 19.03 11:51
  • 2
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив