Войти

The knife" does not save the T-64 tanks of the 2017 model from destruction

2907
0
0

Image Source: Photo: Bravery2004

Until recently, the Ukrainian army had about two hundred T-64BV tanks of the 2017 model in service. During the modernization, night sights were replaced with them - thermal imaging sights were installed instead of the old infrared ones.

We bought NATO-standard radio stations and internal intercom devices. The most dubious novelty was the use of "reactive armor" "Knife". Allegedly, its elements were mounted in old containers from dynamic protection "Contact".

"Knife" was criticized at the time, and not in vain. So, during the fighting in the Donbass, there were cases when this DZ, having worked, inflicted heavy damage to tanks, for example, disabled the chassis, depriving the equipment of the ability to move.

It was then about the BM Bulat tanks, but it turned out to be even worse on the T-64BV, judging by the materials that appeared on the Network, the "Knife" works every other time, and sometimes does not react at all to the anti-tank ammunition that got into it. However, it is not yet clear whether we are talking about an inefficient installation method or the elements are already made with a defect. As a result, the APU has already lost some of the upgraded tanks.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.04 23:25
  • 8478
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 19.04 20:12
  • 0
Ответ на ""Откуда взялась третья ракета?" Как был сбит украинский F-16"
  • 19.04 15:42
  • 10
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 19.04 12:49
  • 2
19FortyFive: США могут забыть о F-47, поскольку Китай строит один истребитель-«невидимку» за другим
  • 19.04 02:48
  • 1
О Ту-22Мn, -95М, -160, Су-34, и ПАК ДА
  • 19.04 01:05
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе назвали украинские F-16 устаревшими"
  • 18.04 13:35
  • 2
The Ukrainian BMPT "Sentinel" based on the T-64BV turned out to be a stillborn project
  • 18.04 04:20
  • 4
Ответ на "Российский бомбардировщик Ту-160М: самое неожиданное возвращение (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 17.04 06:53
  • 1
В НАСА заявили о готовности модулей станции Gateway
  • 17.04 06:33
  • 0
Ответ на "Будет ли военно-морской флот России сотрудничать с Китаем, чтобы бросить вызов гегемонии США на море? (Tencent, Китай)"
  • 17.04 02:04
  • 0
Ответ на " Названа новая задача Су-35С"
  • 17.04 01:58
  • 1
Will the Russian Navy cooperate with China to challenge U.S. hegemony at sea? (Tencent, China)
  • 16.04 15:59
  • 1
The last of the Mohicans and the flying "Chinese": what disappoints the 6th generation of US aircraft
  • 16.04 15:54
  • 1
Названа способная повлиять на ход СВО российская разработка
  • 16.04 15:43
  • 1
Управляемый из Москвы FPV-дрон «Овод» поразил объект ВСУ в ДНР