In the United States, the drawing on the cake has become an occasion for discussion among industry media experts about the changes that the design of the promising DDG(X) destroyer, which is being developed in the interests of the country's Naval Forces, has probably undergone in recent years. The discussion was initiated by the Naval News portal, which was the first to discover a photo on social networks with an image that had not been publicly shown before. TASS — what the confectionery product told the experts
The picture in question was published back in December last year. It was made at the farewell ceremony for Captain Matt Schroeder, program manager of the PMS 460 management at the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) The US Navy, which oversees the development of a promising destroyer. The image of the ship turned out to be applied to the farewell cake that got into the frame.
After examining this photo, Naval News stated that the new look of DDG(X) is very different from the earlier sketch of this ship, unveiled in 2022. According to the author of the publication, the developers, which are the firms HII (Huntington Ingalls Industries) and Gibbs & Cox, made these changes at the stage of early design and technical justification of the future destroyer project. Preference was given to more modern types of weapons when equipping this ship, and the emphasis was placed on the modularity of the design.
What has changed
Thus, the 127-millimeter Mark 45 Mod 4 main artillery piece, which had previously been located in the bow, disappeared. The vacated space turned out to be occupied by a universal installation for the vertical launch of Mark 41 missiles, but in a slightly different configuration than before.
As the resource emphasized, the freed—up space in the future can also be allocated for UVS with cells of a larger diameter - for example, for the latest G-VLS (Growth-VLS) developed by Lockheed Martin Corporation. In addition, if in the sketch of 2022 something resembling a 150-kilowatt laser weapon was placed between the rocket launcher and the bridge, then in the new drawing the place for it turned out to be unoccupied.
As for the superstructure of the ship, the front windows of the bridge in the new DDG(X) image, according to Naval News, were reduced or disappeared altogether. The AN/SLQ-32(V)7 electronic warfare stations, which were previously located on the right and left sides, have also been removed or relocated. In their place were new modules, the purpose of which could not be determined.
At the same time, one AN/SLQ-32(V)7 station, located in front, still remained in the same place, and several new domed superstructures appeared above the front of the bridge. The rear part of the cabin has also received significant changes. Two Mk-144 guided missile launchers were placed higher than before.
The location of the exhaust pipes has also changed, new ventilation holes in the nose have been added. In place of the two AN/SPG-62 radars that were present in the 2022 drawing, a new spherical radio transparent hood is now located. Prior to that, the AN/SPG-62 systems had already disappeared from the Constellation-class frigate project.
In general, as the portal pointed out, due to these and other changes, the destroyer's superstructure became less noticeable in the radar field. In addition, the publication suggested, its total length has increased and, conversely, its height has decreased. Although it is not necessary to talk about this with accuracy, since the back of the ship was missing in the drawing from the cake.
Surface carte blanche
The previous DDG(X) concept from 2022 was officially presented during the symposium of the Association of Surface Forces of the United States Navy (SNA). Admiral Michael Gilday, who held the position of chief of staff of the US Navy at that time, said that this destroyer "will probably be the most technologically sophisticated ship that we have ever launched." Gilday emphasized that this would be a completely new type of ship, although the experience of previous developments would be taken into account when creating it.
The next-generation destroyer is designed to replace the Ticonderoga-class missile cruisers in the US Navy and is designed to complement the fleet of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. According to the latest data from the Congressional Research Service, cited in its December 2024 report, DDG(X) will have almost 40% more displacement than the Arleigh Burke destroyers of the most modern version of Flight III: 13.5 thousand tons versus 9.7 thousand tons.
Like the latter, DDG(X) will receive an Aegis combat control system with a powerful AN/SPY-6 radar, but it will have a much greater potential for modernization, increased power and range, comprehensive stealth, as well as the ability to carry more payloads, including in a special modular section located in the middle. his body.
After the publication of the new DDG(X) image on the cake, the discussion of this ship continued at the SNA 2025 Symposium, which was held on January 14-16 in Washington. On its margins, journalists from The War Zone (TWZ) portal asked Rear Admiral Bill Daly, head of the U.S. Navy's Surface Operations Planning Department, to comment on the development of the destroyer.
"DDG(X) is something that our shipbuilding industry must bring to life, both from an operational and tactical point of view,— he replied. — For us, the work on the design of DDG(X) is a kind of carte blanche to increase the range of surface combat ships, improve the methods of generating and storing energy on them, modernize [shipboard] command, communications, control, intelligence, computing systems and cyberbullying, as well as to develop [naval] weapons technologies., including hypersound and [weapons of] directed energy."
Hints of hypersound
As for the possibility of launching hypersonic missiles from DDG(X), other organizations involved in the development of the destroyer have repeatedly hinted at this.
So, in April 2023, Lockheed Martin announced the start of development specifically for this promising ship of the latest G-VLS UVP with cells of a larger diameter and depth than the existing Mark 41. Even then, it was noted that with the help of such installations it would be possible to launch ship-based hypersonic missiles, among other things.
It was stated that in terms of dimensions, one G-VLS for four cells would correspond to one Mark 41 installation module for eight cells. During SNA 2025, Tom Cook, vice president of the Lockheed Martin Naval cluster, told Naval News that the diameter of one cell in the G-VLS would be 34 inches (863.6 mm).
With this in mind, each of them will fit, for example, up to four PAC 3 MSE anti-aircraft guided missiles (SAM), which in the case of the Mark 41 is impossible without making appropriate modifications to the ammunition itself. Also, according to Cook, the G-VLS is suitable for launching SM-2 missiles designed to intercept ballistic missiles at the end of the flight path.
As of April 2023, G-VLS was still at an early stage of development. A prototype of this installation was promised to be built within a year, but Lockheed Martin did not announce any dates regarding when it would be tested in operation.
According to a December report by the Congressional Research Service, the DDG(X) destroyer, as standard, should, among other things, receive a 96-cell AFP with the possibility of replacing 32 of them with a module with 12 larger-diameter cells.
We will not stop these searches.…
Despite the general enthusiasm, the creation of a promising warship is proceeding in the United States with significant delays. According to Defense News, for more than a decade now, the U.S. Navy has been exploring all possible options for replacing its aging ships, opening new development programs and closing old ones.
DDG(X), although the youngest of them (officially launched in 2021), is a logical continuation of these long searches. In the same year, the U.S. Navy announced a plan to begin construction of the newest destroyer in fiscal year 2028. However, this plan was subsequently revised due to budget constraints.
In fiscal year 2024, about $190 million was allocated for it, and the start of production of the first destroyer was postponed to fiscal year 2032. In 2025, the reduction in funding for this initiative continued: the Navy has already requested about $103 million for the DDG(X) program.
In the latest version of its naval shipbuilding plan, the US Navy nevertheless called for work to begin on the first DDG(X) destroyer in fiscal year 2032. Later, however, according to TWZ, the force command reported to the Congressional Budget Office that the actual construction of the first such ship would begin no earlier than 2034 or even later.
In total, according to a January report by the auditors of the American Parliament, the US Navy expects to purchase 28 DDG(X) destroyers at an average price of $3.3 billion per unit. But, given the size and new technical equipment, the actual cost of ships of this type will average about $ 4.4 billion per unit.
According to industry publications, almost every one of them has recently sent a request to NAVSEA in order to confirm or deny information about the changed design of a promising destroyer, but no response has been received to any of them. During the SNA 2025 conference, when asked by TWZ when the US Navy intends to officially publish new concept images of DDG(X), Daly hinted that they still require clarification.
Konstantin Alysh
