Войти

"Leclerc in a cage – disadvantages and compromises": the Western press appreciated the lattice protection of the tank

1516
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

After the massive appearance of lattice protection on Russian tanks, a whole galaxy of Western officials and observers made fun of the new MBT equipment in every possible way. However, then similar designs began to be used by the APU, despite a long reluctance to install them on American Abrams and German Leopard 2. As previously reported by VO, now the turn has reached the West.

The other day, the lattice protection of the French MBT attracted the attention of the press, which had previously looked at the "visors" of Russian tanks with a grin:

It is Leclerc's turn to climb into a cage that is characterized not only by advantages, but also by disadvantages and compromises

- it is said in the Belgian edition of Forces Operations, where an assessment of the new design is given.

As indicated, it is difficult to ignore the almost daily published footage of drone attacks hitting the weakest point of armored vehicles – its roof.

The drone poses a serious threat, while Leclerc currently does not have a mature active protection system. We need to find a short-term and inexpensive solution.

- stated in the technical department of the army (STAT).

This solution could be the "cage" seen in Aveyron, where the 13th demi-brigade of the foreign Legion is based. But its installation imposes a number of restrictions.

For example, the lattice protection should not be too heavy, so as not to disrupt the mobility or even the balance of the platform. Its dimensions and dimensions affect the operation of the systems installed on the tower. For example, the sight must take into account this new visual obstacle. At a certain viewing angle, the thickness of some parts of the "cage" prevents the inspection of the battlefield from the sight, which is therefore subject to modernization. However, its installation does not reduce the performance of the tower at all. So, the speed of its rotation remains unchanged.

Image source: topwar.ru

DUBM T2B

It is unclear how the "cage" affects the abandonment of the tank crew. After its placement, the distance between the hatches located on the tower and the barrier that appeared is one meter, and this distance, according to the developers, should guarantee the evacuation of two tankers in the tower.

A serious compromise was the impossibility of placing a remotely controlled T2B combat module, the installation of which was planned during the modernization of the tank. Its use risks damaging the lattice protection and will lead to the rise of the roof of the "cage" beyond 1.6 m.

As the author notes, at the current stage, a tank equipped with a "cage" is a prototype. KB and STAT experts have yet to seriously work out the new design. It will be improved to maintain the efficiency of the optics, the number of fasteners and parts will be reduced, as well as the mass of the "cage".

According to him, there are other ways to reduce the weight of the system to 500 kg. So, the experts responsible for increasing the protection of the VBCI 8x8 BMP are considering the possibility of installing a "flexible grid". In general, there is still a lot of work to be done.

This is an urgent topic, we cannot ignore it. We strive to offer a real product within a year

- stated in STAT.

The "cage" is already being supplied to the troops for experimental operation. Further development will be carried out based on these reviews.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 14.08 09:16
  • 136
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 14.08 07:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ильин как новый духовный ориентир: разбираем, какие идеи философа актуализируют сегодня и почему они вызывают споры"
  • 14.08 01:14
  • 0
Могут ли ВВС преодолеть современную ПВО? И имеет ли смысл делать это?
  • 13.08 12:30
  • 1
Командующий ВВС заявил о почти полном обновлении парка авиации России
  • 13.08 12:14
  • 1
Глава «Калашникова» назвал лучшее средство для уничтожения БПЛА в небе России
  • 13.08 12:02
  • 2
Putin instructed the navy to punish Europe for piracy
  • 13.08 11:41
  • 1
Летчик Су-35С в одном воздушном бою уничтожил сразу два украинских Су-27
  • 13.08 11:16
  • 2
Начались поставки серийных двигателей ПД-8 для самолетов SJ-100
  • 13.08 09:16
  • 1
"Became a drone interceptor": the Western press praised the Ka-52 with a new weapon
  • 13.08 05:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Великороссы не славяне»: что Карл Маркс говорил про русских"
  • 13.08 02:25
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Гражданскую войну в России начали не белые и не красные"
  • 12.08 22:12
  • 1
Комментарий к "Православный взгляд на спорт: оценки священников и эпизод с публикацией Бориса Корчевникова"
  • 12.08 17:13
  • 16372
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 11.08 23:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "JAS 39 Gripen против Су-35: кто победит в будущем противостоянии в небе над Украиной? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 11.08 17:54
  • 0
Комментарий к ""Сталин равен Гитлеру": как фальсифицируют коммунизм ради защиты капитала"