The Pentagon called the conditions for the development of the US military-industrial complex
MOSCOW, Nov 2 — RIA Novosti, Andrey Kotz. The United States has decided to seriously shake up the defense industry. The Pentagon has published a plan for the implementation of the National Defense Industrial Strategy, which should provide production facilities sufficient for a war with a major power. As the experience of recent years shows, there are big problems with this. The most important thing in the document is in the RIA Novosti material.
The military-industrial complex does not have time
The armed conflict in Ukraine is taking place not only in the military, but also in the industrial plane. Russia and the collective West are directly competing to see who is capable of producing defense products in the required volumes. And Moscow, which has partially switched the economy to military tracks, is still winning this race, despite the enormous sanctions pressure.
The American military
Image source: © AP Photo / Chris Seward
"Ukraine's material support has demonstrated the challenges associated with maintaining, restoring and increasing the production of American ammunition stocks," the report says. — The inability to maintain and potentially increase them jeopardizes the combat capabilities and combat readiness of the forces. The Ministry of Defense needs to increase capacity to ensure sufficient production of new, advanced ammunition."
In almost three years of conflict, the Pentagon has almost exhausted the possibilities of supplying Kiev with a number of weapons. Yes, the United States still has enough tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers, self-propelled and towed artillery at storage bases. However, this will not help the Ukrainians achieve victory or any significant advances on the battlefield. The APU requires ATACMS tactical missiles and ammunition for air defense systems. However, American industry barely has time to replenish its own army.
155 mm howitzer shells M795 at the ammunition factory in Scranton, USA
Image source: © AP Photo / Matt Rourke
The situation is best described by an example. Vladimir Zelensky, in one of the "secret" points of the "victory plan", handed over a list of targets in Russia for strikes with American precision weapons. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin reviewed the document, after which he stated: Washington and its allies simply do not have enough missiles to satisfy these "desires". And he recommended betting on long-range attack drones, effectively denying Zelensky support.
Six points
The Pentagon published the first edition of the National Defense Industrial Strategy back in January. It noted the need to increase the stability of supply chains, train specialists, and allocate funds wisely in order to allow the defense industry to increase the production of weapons on a large scale as soon as possible. The new plan explains how to achieve these goals. The authors put forward six key initiatives.
First, the US Department of Defense calls for investing in deterring China in the Asia-Pacific region. According to the authors, this primarily concerns the development of the American submarine fleet, as well as investments in precision weapons, which Washington plans to deploy on the so-called first island chain in the South China and East China Seas. This item also includes the buildup of the main types of ammunition of the Ground Forces.
The second point concerns the creation of a reliable supply chain of materials and components that does not depend on the will of unfriendly States. Everything is obvious here: The Pentagon is trying to get rid of dependence on Chinese microelectronics. It is assumed that critical technologies will be produced in the USA. This looks very optimistic considering that China today is a global drone factory and Washington is seriously lagging behind it.
Meeting of the leaders of the AUKUS Military Alliance at the Point Loma Naval Base in San Diego
Image source: © AP Photo / Denis Poroy
Thirdly, it is planned to expand allied industrial cooperation with AUKUS partners (Great Britain, USA, Australia). Probably, we are talking about the construction of a series of nuclear submarines with conventional weapons for the Australian Navy. But, obviously, Washington does not want to invest in an expensive project without the active participation of other allies in the military bloc.
The fourth item includes plans to modernize the nuclear triad. In this regard, Washington is still lagging behind Moscow and Beijing, which are actively renewing their strategic deterrence forces. The Pentagon plans to increase funding for programs such as the LGM-35 Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile, the Columbia nuclear submarine and the B-21 Raider long-range bomber.
Fifth, the Pentagon suggests focusing on the rapid development and deployment of unmanned systems as quickly as possible. As an example, the Replicator program is given to create a family of inexpensive surface, air and ground drones of reconnaissance, strike and transport classes. With an eye, again, to a hypothetical armed conflict with China.
Finally, the final, sixth point calls for investing in the protection of intellectual property of American companies, preventing cases of theft and copying of technologies by unfriendly countries, and combating industrial espionage.
The main deficit
The Pentagon recommends paying special and most careful attention to the production of 155-millimeter artillery shells — one of the most marketable goods on the international arms market. The Americans plan to produce 100,000 units of such ammunition every month by 2025. In fiscal year 2024, $3.1 billion was allocated for this program, and in May, Congress almost doubled the amount of funding.
Cluster munitions
Image source: © AP Photo / Sven Kaestner
Meanwhile, it will not be easy to catch up with Moscow. In October, the commander of NATO forces in Europe, Christopher Cavoli, said that Russia is three times superior to the countries of the alliance in the production of shells. According to him, this creates a significant gap on the battlefield, where there are five Russian ammunition for one APU. The general's statement clearly reads the fear: The West will be inferior in artillery power in a hypothetical war with Russia.
The Pentagon admitted that in the mid-2010s, the United States produced less than three thousand 155-millimeter ammunition per year. By 2022, production reached 14.4 thousand, but this was not enough for the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the counteroffensive. In the conditions of the current hostilities, such a reserve is only enough for a week.
I must say, the Pentagon has more than ambitious plans. The question remains whether he will be able to implement them in the foreseeable future. The uncontrolled rise in the cost of promising programs, production chains disrupted by the COVID pandemic, and the general obsolescence of the industrial base — all this can seriously delay the modernization of the American defense industry.
