Войти

China's newest submarine has sunk. It could have nuclear fuel on it, but Beijing is hiding everything

741
0
0

WSJ: China's newest nuclear submarine sank near Wuhan

The newest nuclear submarine sank in China. It happened at a shipyard near the Chinese city of Wuhan back in May-June. Despite the fact that the Chinese authorities tried to hide this fact, a number of American media outlets drew attention to it.

It is currently unknown whether she was transporting nuclear fuel at the time of the sinking, but The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) journalists who wrote about the situation do not deny this. At the same time, it is noted that, most likely, no one took water samples after the emergency, since there are no signs indicating this. In addition, there is no data on possible casualties and consequences.

The source of the publication in the American Ministry of Defense noted that the concealment of this fact by the Chinese authorities is not surprising.

In addition to the obvious questions about training standards and equipment quality, the incident raises deeper questions about the internal accountability of the PLA (People's Liberation Army of China. — Approx. "Tapes.<url>") and the supervision of China's defense industry, which has long suffered from corruption

WSJ source in the US Department of Defense

Beijing has not yet commented on this information. The authorities refer to the fact that they are not familiar with the situation.


A shipyard near Wuhan.
Source: Planet Labs Inc / Reuters

The sunken submarine was last seen on the water in May

The wreck turned out to be a Zhou class submarine, which is the first vessel of its type. Its creator is the state-owned company China State Shipbuilding Corp., it was built at the Wuachang shipyard.

At the end of May, she was last seen on the water. The submarine was located at a pier on the Yangtze River — there it was equipped before going to sea. Satellite images indicate that the submarine was lifted from the bottom in early June — then large floating cranes were noticed at the scene of the emergency. The innovative structure involved improved stealth technologies that would make it difficult for active and passive sonars to detect the vessel. The submarine had an X-shaped stern, which was supposed to make it more maneuverable.


The PLA submarine.
Source: Jason Lee / Reuters

The military expert did not see anything serious in the situation

According to military expert, Reserve Colonel Viktor Litovkin, progress is often associated with unfortunate moments. He called such situations "an inevitable price to pay for moving forward."

The specialist noted that if the submarine, as the media write, really sank near the pier, then there should be no problems in lifting it from the bottom. In his opinion, it was not a matter of design problems, since two years ago China already had six nuclear submarines. Most likely, Litovkin explained, there was a human factor.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 30.04 15:11
  • 8714
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 30.04 14:57
  • 14
A military simulator has demonstrated an ominous scenario of Russian missiles attacking Britain, destroying military bases and Royal Air Force fighter jets (The Sun, UK)
  • 30.04 14:15
  • 23
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 30.04 08:18
  • 2
Сладков: Пришло время для корейской ЧВК?
  • 30.04 06:44
  • 0
Некоторые пояснения касательно текста "Эти три впечатляющие лодки составляют костяк подводного флота России (The National Interest, США)"
  • 30.04 05:48
  • 0
Ответ на "Новые задачи: как ВС РФ будут действовать после освобождения Курской области"
  • 30.04 03:20
  • 1
В США обеспокоились продажей данных о мозге
  • 30.04 03:13
  • 1
Подписан контракт на закупку 26 истребителей Rafale для ВМС Индии
  • 30.04 02:57
  • 1
How Ukraine can destroy the Western alliance (Financial Times, UK)
  • 29.04 21:43
  • 0
Ответ на "Польша раскрывает свои планы по превращению в мощную военную державу (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 29.04 20:56
  • 0
Ответ на "Мирное соглашение Трампа ужасно. Но Украина все равно должна его принять (The Times, Великобритания)"
  • 29.04 20:44
  • 1
Poland reveals its plans to become a powerful military power (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 29.04 19:43
  • 0
Ответ на "Польская пресса: война выявила ограниченную полезность амфибийных свойств бронетехники"
  • 29.04 19:16
  • 0
По поводу "Будущее перемирие: какие территории будут контролировать Украина и Россия (Фокус.ua, Украина)"
  • 29.04 12:33
  • 1
The future truce: which territories will be controlled by Ukraine and Russia (Focus.ua, Ukraine)