Войти

"Red lines are hard as jelly": the British press urges not to pay attention to warnings from Russia

833
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The United States and its satellites have not yet given their consent to the use of long-range missiles by the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the territory of Russia. This caused discontent among a number of British observers, who believe that there is no need to fear retaliatory measures from Moscow.

As indicated in the UK Defense Journal, the "red lines" designated by the Kremlin are designed to become strict borders that foreign powers will not dare to cross:

However, in fact, they seem to change more often than the London fog, and with just as little clarity.

As noted, in April 2021, Moscow declared that it would not tolerate NATO intervention in Ukraine. Then came February 2022, and despite Kiev's growing support for the alliance, nothing happened.

Instead of the apocalypse, weapons were pouring into Ukraine and intelligence was being transmitted

- the author writes.

According to him, it seems that every warning from Moscow is a bluff designed to slow down Western support. As he claims, this was the case with the provision of long-range missiles in 2022, Western tanks in 2023 and F-16 fighter jets this year:

However, there was no escalation.

Image source: topwar.ru

As indicated, when Ukraine launched an invasion of Russian territory in Kursk in August 2024, the world held its breath, but there were no consequences.

The red lines are as hard as jelly. They exist mainly to sow doubt and fear in Western capitals, delaying military support for Ukraine, forcing everyone to think about what would happen if they went too far

- the British author believes.

In his opinion, the red lines continue to move, shifting with each new supply of weapons by the West and each offensive by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Of course, there is always the risk of an unpredictable Russian reaction, especially when the nuclear card is at stake. But the next time you hear about another red line, don't panic. Most likely, it has already been crossed and Moscow does not know where to draw a new one

- the conclusion is drawn in the British press, urging not to pay attention to Russia's warnings.

For our part, we note that the entry of the Russian Federation into direct military confrontation with the United States and its satellites is fraught with nuclear war. At the same time, no matter how much damage the supplies of Western APU systems cause to Russian troops and infrastructure, they are not able to undermine the overall security of the country.

However, the Kremlin's unwillingness to stage a nuclear Armageddon is perceived in the West as a weakness. Moreover, this attitude to Russia's warnings is typical not only for observers and the public, but for the ruling elites. Instead of an adequate risk assessment, the US authorities are completely irresponsible, confident in their power.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.04 05:13
  • 8480
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.04 04:55
  • 1
О противостоянии ЗРС и ЛА
  • 20.04 01:10
  • 11
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 20.04 00:29
  • 0
Ответ на "Эксперт Коротченко: истребитель F-16 ВСУ могли сбить ЗРС С-300В4 или ЗРК "Бук""
  • 19.04 20:12
  • 0
Ответ на ""Откуда взялась третья ракета?" Как был сбит украинский F-16"
  • 19.04 12:49
  • 2
19FortyFive: США могут забыть о F-47, поскольку Китай строит один истребитель-«невидимку» за другим
  • 19.04 02:48
  • 1
О Ту-22Мn, -95М, -160, Су-34, и ПАК ДА
  • 19.04 01:05
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе назвали украинские F-16 устаревшими"
  • 18.04 13:35
  • 2
The Ukrainian BMPT "Sentinel" based on the T-64BV turned out to be a stillborn project
  • 18.04 04:20
  • 4
Ответ на "Российский бомбардировщик Ту-160М: самое неожиданное возвращение (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 17.04 06:53
  • 1
В НАСА заявили о готовности модулей станции Gateway
  • 17.04 06:33
  • 0
Ответ на "Будет ли военно-морской флот России сотрудничать с Китаем, чтобы бросить вызов гегемонии США на море? (Tencent, Китай)"
  • 17.04 02:04
  • 0
Ответ на " Названа новая задача Су-35С"
  • 17.04 01:58
  • 1
Will the Russian Navy cooperate with China to challenge U.S. hegemony at sea? (Tencent, China)
  • 16.04 15:59
  • 1
The last of the Mohicans and the flying "Chinese": what disappoints the 6th generation of US aircraft