Войти

Australia continues to "entertain" with options for the development of the submarine fleet

1718
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Due to the fact that the entry of the first Virginia submarines into service (if it happens at all) is expected sometime in the early 2030s, the possibility of refitting Collins submarines for the use of Tomahawk missile launchers is being discussed. Australia continues to "make fun"...

The boats are no longer very new, besides unsuccessful in design. Spending even very large sums on their rearmament does not seem too reasonable. These boats were problematic even at the tender and design stage. Already at the conclusion of the contract, there were well-founded accusations of bias and corruption, since the tender was won by a not-too-well-known Swedish firm, leaving behind famous competitors from Germany, France, England, etc.

During the construction process, scandals also periodically occurred during the assembly of buildings and installation of equipment. Immediately after the start of operation, it turned out that the boats are very noisy and technical reliability is at a low level. Very serious and expensive alterations were required. Then there were considerable expenses when arming these submarines with American Harpoon missile defense systems.

And now, the Australians are determined to spend a considerable amount of money on the conversion of these boats, especially since they themselves do not need submarines with CRBD. The US needs them to create additional problems for China. Since the Tomahawks will be able to fly to China from areas located north of Australia. But why are Australians doing this?..

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.07 06:19
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 19.07 20:21
  • 16305
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"
  • 19.07 02:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Мифы о нелепых атаках"
  • 19.07 01:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "ИХ ПЛАНЫ"
  • 19.07 01:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Александр Зиновьев 21 год воевал с СССР, а вернулся его защищать"
  • 19.07 00:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Бюсты Николая II по всей России — символ возрождения или подготовка к краху"
  • 18.07 23:53
  • 6
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 18.07 22:42
  • 0
На тему "Интересных нестыковок в описании событий Великой Отечественной войны"
  • 18.07 21:11
  • 0
Комментарий к "В СССР долго думали, но все же отказались от одного из самых технологичных танков своего времени. Чем не угодил Т-64 так и не став основным"
  • 18.07 19:26
  • 0
Комментарий к "Три направления: где может посыпаться украинская оборона"
  • 18.07 18:31
  • 0
Комментарий к "На Западе оценили планы ударов украинской FP-9 по Москве и Санкт-Петербургу"