Войти

Australia continues to "entertain" with options for the development of the submarine fleet

1696
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Due to the fact that the entry of the first Virginia submarines into service (if it happens at all) is expected sometime in the early 2030s, the possibility of refitting Collins submarines for the use of Tomahawk missile launchers is being discussed. Australia continues to "make fun"...

The boats are no longer very new, besides unsuccessful in design. Spending even very large sums on their rearmament does not seem too reasonable. These boats were problematic even at the tender and design stage. Already at the conclusion of the contract, there were well-founded accusations of bias and corruption, since the tender was won by a not-too-well-known Swedish firm, leaving behind famous competitors from Germany, France, England, etc.

During the construction process, scandals also periodically occurred during the assembly of buildings and installation of equipment. Immediately after the start of operation, it turned out that the boats are very noisy and technical reliability is at a low level. Very serious and expensive alterations were required. Then there were considerable expenses when arming these submarines with American Harpoon missile defense systems.

And now, the Australians are determined to spend a considerable amount of money on the conversion of these boats, especially since they themselves do not need submarines with CRBD. The US needs them to create additional problems for China. Since the Tomahawks will be able to fly to China from areas located north of Australia. But why are Australians doing this?..

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.07 23:13
  • 16222
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.07 21:13
  • 2
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 01.07 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)
  • 01.07 00:22
  • 2
Комментарий к "В России предложен новый способ борьбы с авианосцами США"
  • 30.06 23:56
  • 1
Британия отказалась от новых эсминцев в пользу гибридных кораблей с БЛА
  • 30.06 23:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО под давлением, Европе предстоит крупнейшее перевооружение в истории (El Pais, Испания)"
  • 30.06 22:57
  • 1
В США оценили воздушный компонент ядерной триады России
  • 30.06 18:38
  • 3
В Госдуме предложили приравнять к госизмене коррупцию в военной сфере
  • 30.06 18:14
  • 1
ОСК создаст собственный дивизион двигателестроения
  • 30.06 11:32
  • 1
Комментарий к "Украина предложила воевать только в четырех регионах. Почему Россия на это не пойдет?"
  • 29.06 19:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Для войны с Россией. На создании какого оружия сосредоточилась Европа"