Войти

Australia continues to "entertain" with options for the development of the submarine fleet

1572
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Due to the fact that the entry of the first Virginia submarines into service (if it happens at all) is expected sometime in the early 2030s, the possibility of refitting Collins submarines for the use of Tomahawk missile launchers is being discussed. Australia continues to "make fun"...

The boats are no longer very new, besides unsuccessful in design. Spending even very large sums on their rearmament does not seem too reasonable. These boats were problematic even at the tender and design stage. Already at the conclusion of the contract, there were well-founded accusations of bias and corruption, since the tender was won by a not-too-well-known Swedish firm, leaving behind famous competitors from Germany, France, England, etc.

During the construction process, scandals also periodically occurred during the assembly of buildings and installation of equipment. Immediately after the start of operation, it turned out that the boats are very noisy and technical reliability is at a low level. Very serious and expensive alterations were required. Then there were considerable expenses when arming these submarines with American Harpoon missile defense systems.

And now, the Australians are determined to spend a considerable amount of money on the conversion of these boats, especially since they themselves do not need submarines with CRBD. The US needs them to create additional problems for China. Since the Tomahawks will be able to fly to China from areas located north of Australia. But why are Australians doing this?..

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.04 12:50
  • 15327
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 03.04 10:58
  • 908
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 03.04 04:44
  • 0
Комментарии к "Как усилить защиту нефтяной инфраструктуры России", и "Недружественный огонь: как Россия ответит на украинские атаки на Усть-Лугу"
  • 03.04 02:42
  • 2
Западная пресса: «Россия выстроила кольцо ПВО вокруг Москвы»
  • 03.04 01:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Трёхходовка Нетаньяху. Трамп лишь ширма? Раскрыта стратегическая игра Израиля"
  • 02.04 18:35
  • 1
Kalibry guided Indonesia to Russian submarines
  • 02.04 18:30
  • 1
Российская «Скорлупа» поступила в зону СВО
  • 02.04 18:23
  • 1
How to strengthen the protection of Russia's oil infrastructure
  • 02.04 18:15
  • 1
Unfriendly fire: how Russia will respond to the Ukrainian attacks on Ust-Luga
  • 02.04 17:58
  • 112
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 02.04 17:38
  • 4
Новейший российский «Союз-5» впервые запустят 2 апреля
  • 02.04 17:34
  • 2
Experts explained the difference between the Apollo and Artemis lunar missions
  • 02.04 17:23
  • 1
Новый российский аналог Starlink: стоимость спутников может достигнуть 27 млрд рублей, а расходы на их запуск могут добавить еще десятки миллиардов
  • 02.04 03:51
  • 1
Merz goes into conflict with Trump: three main risks (Der Spiegel, Germany)
  • 01.04 21:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Как американские подводные лодки помогли США победить в холодной войне"