Войти

More than 60 countries have agreed on the need to control weapons with artificial intelligence

1374
0
0

Combat Robot With the advent of artificial intelligence, it became clear that sooner or later it would be used for military purposes, after which a number of serious ethical problems arose.

For example, how the AI will dispose of the right to destroy people, if it is granted to it.

Last week, The Hague hosted the first international conference on the responsible use of artificial intelligence in the military field, REAIM 23, convened on the initiative of the Netherlands and South Korea with the participation of more than 60 countries. Following the summit, its participants (with the exception of Israel) signed a petition stating that the countries they represent express their commitment to using AI in accordance with international law, without undermining the principles of "international security, stability and accountability." Among the issues that the participants of REAIM 23 also discussed were the reliability of military AI, the unintended consequences of its use, the risks of escalation and the degree of involvement of people in the decision—making process. According to critical experts, this petition, while not binding, does not solve many problems, including the use of AI in military conflicts, as well as UAVs controlled by artificial intelligence. And such fears are far from unfounded. So, one of the largest US military contractors Lockheed Martin reported that its new training fighter, being in the air for about 20 hours, was controlled by AI all this time. And Google CEO Eric Schmidt shared his concerns about the fact that AI itself can provoke military conflicts, including with the use of nuclear weapons.

Alexander Ageev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.04 01:10
  • 11
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 20.04 00:34
  • 8479
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.04 00:29
  • 0
Ответ на "Эксперт Коротченко: истребитель F-16 ВСУ могли сбить ЗРС С-300В4 или ЗРК "Бук""
  • 19.04 20:12
  • 0
Ответ на ""Откуда взялась третья ракета?" Как был сбит украинский F-16"
  • 19.04 12:49
  • 2
19FortyFive: США могут забыть о F-47, поскольку Китай строит один истребитель-«невидимку» за другим
  • 19.04 02:48
  • 1
О Ту-22Мn, -95М, -160, Су-34, и ПАК ДА
  • 19.04 01:05
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе назвали украинские F-16 устаревшими"
  • 18.04 13:35
  • 2
The Ukrainian BMPT "Sentinel" based on the T-64BV turned out to be a stillborn project
  • 18.04 04:20
  • 4
Ответ на "Российский бомбардировщик Ту-160М: самое неожиданное возвращение (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 17.04 06:53
  • 1
В НАСА заявили о готовности модулей станции Gateway
  • 17.04 06:33
  • 0
Ответ на "Будет ли военно-морской флот России сотрудничать с Китаем, чтобы бросить вызов гегемонии США на море? (Tencent, Китай)"
  • 17.04 02:04
  • 0
Ответ на " Названа новая задача Су-35С"
  • 17.04 01:58
  • 1
Will the Russian Navy cooperate with China to challenge U.S. hegemony at sea? (Tencent, China)
  • 16.04 15:59
  • 1
The last of the Mohicans and the flying "Chinese": what disappoints the 6th generation of US aircraft
  • 16.04 15:54
  • 1
Названа способная повлиять на ход СВО российская разработка