Войти

More than 60 countries have agreed on the need to control weapons with artificial intelligence

1526
0
0

Combat Robot With the advent of artificial intelligence, it became clear that sooner or later it would be used for military purposes, after which a number of serious ethical problems arose.

For example, how the AI will dispose of the right to destroy people, if it is granted to it.

Last week, The Hague hosted the first international conference on the responsible use of artificial intelligence in the military field, REAIM 23, convened on the initiative of the Netherlands and South Korea with the participation of more than 60 countries. Following the summit, its participants (with the exception of Israel) signed a petition stating that the countries they represent express their commitment to using AI in accordance with international law, without undermining the principles of "international security, stability and accountability." Among the issues that the participants of REAIM 23 also discussed were the reliability of military AI, the unintended consequences of its use, the risks of escalation and the degree of involvement of people in the decision—making process. According to critical experts, this petition, while not binding, does not solve many problems, including the use of AI in military conflicts, as well as UAVs controlled by artificial intelligence. And such fears are far from unfounded. So, one of the largest US military contractors Lockheed Martin reported that its new training fighter, being in the air for about 20 hours, was controlled by AI all this time. And Google CEO Eric Schmidt shared his concerns about the fact that AI itself can provoke military conflicts, including with the use of nuclear weapons.

Alexander Ageev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 09.10 16:13
  • 8
Для защиты заводов по переработке нефти развернули передвижные группы ПВО
  • 09.10 15:45
  • 10773
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 09.10 14:23
  • 1
Мадуро подписал ратифицированный ранее договор о партнёрстве с Россией
  • 09.10 12:10
  • 0
Литва под прицелом
  • 09.10 07:02
  • 0
Ответ на "В США заявили о «слабости» ПВО России перед дронами ВСУ. И предсказали, что изменят ракеты Tomahawk"
  • 08.10 18:09
  • 0
Комментарий к ""Ядерный взрыв будет хорошо виден в Одессе". Чем Россия ответит на поставки Tomahawk?"
  • 08.10 16:04
  • 1
"The nuclear explosion will be clearly visible in Odessa." How will Russia respond to the delivery of Tomahawk?
  • 08.10 12:42
  • 1529
Корпорация "Иркут" до конца 2018 года поставит ВКС РФ более 30 истребителей Су-30СМ
  • 08.10 11:37
  • 1
Трамп заявил, что принял решение по ракетам Tomahawk и Украине
  • 08.10 05:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названа неочевидная опасность «Томагавков»"
  • 08.10 05:06
  • 3
Украина вряд ли получит ракеты Tomahawk из-за опасности конфликта РФ и США
  • 08.10 04:32
  • 3
В тему "обнуления Томагавков" и прочих БПЛА
  • 08.10 04:22
  • 1
Комментарий к "Новая система международной безопасности – ради сохранения цивилизации"
  • 08.10 03:26
  • 0
Ответ на "Диванные вояки и дипломаты-пустозвоны хотят войны (American Thinker, США)"
  • 07.10 17:59
  • 4
The T-15 heavy infantry fighting vehicle on the Armata platform is perhaps even more necessary than a tank.