Войти

The UK has begun to increase the production of autonomous underwater vehicles

1838
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The UK has begun to increase the production of autonomous underwater vehicles, including drones capable of diving to a depth of 1 km. We are talking about contracts worth a total of 6 million pounds (about 538.7 million rubles) for the production of such uninhabited vehicles with a diving depth of up to 1 thousand meters as Gavia Offshore Surveyor and IVER4 580 in the amount of 2 and 3 units, respectively.

According to the information provided by the contractor, the IVER4 580 underwater drones will be able to descend to a depth of up to 300 m, and the presence of batteries in them, which are replaced in "hot mode", will allow to support the further operation of the device.

It is noteworthy that this is the second unmanned drone of the new generation of the IVER4 family for conducting a wide range of missions, including radiation reconnaissance, as well as conducting anti-submarine and mine operations.

The Royal British Navy also acquired 2 more portable Gavia drones based on a modular design, with various surveillance capabilities with side-view sonar, multipath sonar and acoustic Doppler current meter. They also have a module with equipment for oceanographic research.

In Britain itself, they write the following:

Underwater marine drones have been developed as part of the HECLA project, allowing the British Royal Navy to collect and analyze hydrological and oceanographic data. The need for such a technique is caused by interest in further research of the surrounding oceanic environment, in particular, the North Atlantic region, which is a critical zone in terms of underwater operations, especially with regard to the study of such key factors as the percentage of salt, the speed of sound in seawater, as well as its temperature.

I wonder if the interest in gas pipelines from these underwater vehicles will be higher than the interest in the salt content in seawater?..

Additionally, it is reported that information from underwater drones is extremely relevant for warships (Type 23 frigates) and Boeing P-8 anti-submarine patrol aircraft. And here it is unlikely that a patrol anti-submarine aircraft is lifted into the sky by the British command in order to determine the percentage of salt content and water temperature in the North Atlantic.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 15.07 01:59
  • 16278
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 14.07 22:55
  • 0
Комментарий к "Сословный строй сталинского социализма. Как Ельцин и рабочий класс разрушили СССР."
  • 14.07 20:36
  • 0
О советских ОБТ
  • 14.07 18:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "А вы точно основные танки?"
  • 14.07 14:11
  • 4
Дуров: Чиновнику, «сломавшему интернет» в РФ, американцы должны вручить медаль
  • 14.07 03:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему израильский танк «Меркава» считается самой странной машиной нашего времени? Правда ли, что его придумали советские инженеры?"
  • 14.07 02:51
  • 1
ВВС Филиппин ожидают поставку шести дополнительных самолетов A-29B "Супер Тукано" в 4-м квартале 2026 года
  • 14.07 02:42
  • 1
The FSB thwarted Ukraine's attempt to repeat Operation Spider Web
  • 13.07 19:31
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему советский человек жил вопреки государству, а не благодаря ему"
  • 13.07 16:44
  • 0
Комментарий к "Эксперт: у России есть силы и средства для эскалации, но она их не использует"
  • 13.07 14:55
  • 1
Эксперт: у России есть силы и средства для эскалации, но она их не использует
  • 13.07 05:42
  • 1
Комментарий к "Почему религия- мракобесие: основные аргументы"
  • 13.07 01:18
  • 1
Операторов БПЛА Северного флота обучили работе с «Елками»
  • 12.07 21:42
  • 1
Комментарий к "Главный миф о танке «Абрамс» в который вы до сих пор верите"
  • 12.07 19:55
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Николай II был главным виновником того, что Россия не смогла победить в Первой мировой войне"