Войти

The cost of the next-generation destroyer may be on average $ 1 billion more than the US Navy estimates

1285
0
0
The photo is illustrative in nature

In its annual report on shipbuilding for the Navy, the Congressional Budget Office warned that uncertainty about the final parameters and capabilities of the next-generation destroyer suggests that its final cost on average may differ significantly from the estimates of the US Navy.

The annual report of the Congressional Budget Office estimates the costs of future Naval shipbuilding plans. The document published on November 11 states that the future destroyer will cost from 3.1 to 3.4 billion dollars on average, while after the start of production in 2030, it is planned to purchase from 29 to 47 vessels.

At the same time, internal financial forecasts of the US Navy show that each new ship will cost from 2.3 to 2.4 billion dollars, depending on which version of the 30-year long-term shipbuilding plan lawmakers will use.

In general, the estimated cost of implementing the new destroyer project differs by about 30-40 percent between the estimates of the Navy and the Congressional Budget Office. Uncertainty about the final size and capabilities of the next-generation destroyer suggests that its final cost may differ significantly from the estimated price calculated by both the Navy and Congress.

The report provides a first look at the potential costs of the nascent shipbuilding program. The US Navy earlier this year, during the annual symposium of the Surface Fleet Association, presented an initial overview of what they want to see in the characteristics of a new generation destroyer.

DDG(X) will follow the workhorse Arleigh Burke, a ship that has been repeatedly praised by many senior Navy officials. The predecessor of DDG(X) was already tightly equipped with the best technologies available to the US military.

Historically, the Congressional Finance Service has typically forecast higher shipbuilding costs than the Navy. The reason for this is mainly due to the assumptions that analysts have to make when they consider the cost of materials, inflation rates, levels of generality among older ship variants, as well as many other variables. The longer-term the forecast, the more difficult it is to make an accurate estimate.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 04.06 13:22
  • 9219
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.06 12:55
  • 132
Будущее за тяжелыми "противоснарядными" БМП весом в 55 тонн
  • 04.06 12:43
  • 157
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 04.06 11:32
  • 316
Главком ВМФ России: проработан вопрос о создании нового авианосца
  • 04.06 10:43
  • 3
И еще о "Пантере", и об Internet'е
  • 04.06 09:22
  • 3
APU drones attacked Siberia for the first time. They were flying out of the truck to hit the airfield.
  • 04.06 06:08
  • 0
О новой ситуации, возникшей после атаки на аэродромы стратегической авиации РФ
  • 04.06 03:23
  • 1
Germany becomes the instigator of the World War for the third time (infoBRICS, China)
  • 04.06 01:58
  • 3
Новая программа вооружений может предусматривать до 10 БДК проекта 11711
  • 03.06 19:48
  • 3
МС-21 с новыми российскими моторами и системами отлично показал себя в полёте, летчики довольны
  • 03.06 15:35
  • 1
В Турции спустили на воду третью подлодку с анаэробным двигателем
  • 03.06 13:40
  • 2
"Ростех" сообщил о создании линейки самолетов для военно-транспортной авиации
  • 03.06 13:33
  • 1
Есть нюанс: почему так и не построили укрытия для стратегических и дальних бомбардировщиков ВКС РФ
  • 03.06 13:25
  • 2
Вэсэушники жалуются на применение новых крылатых дронов на базе "Дань-М"
  • 03.06 12:35
  • 21
Зачем и без того мощной авиационной ракете «ядерная» модернизация?