Войти

The US Navy opposes the additional placement of nuclear weapons on ships and submarines

1844
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Navy opposes the additional deployment of sea-based nuclear weapons on ships and submarines. Their representatives believe that it is better to spend these funds on something more necessary, for example, on hypersound.

According to the press service of the United States Navy, this opinion was expressed by the chief of Naval Operations Admiral Mike Gilday in his speech to members of the US Congress.

The deployment of nuclear weapons on surface ships and submarines can be carried out, and among the leadership of the US Department of Defense, many support the idea of developing this type of sea-based weapons. But Gilday believes that equipping the fleet with nuclear weapons will sideline other, more important tasks.

Image source: topwar.ru

During the administration of Donald Trump, the United States began to create a new sea-based cruise missile with a nuclear warhead (SLCM-N), but this program was suspended under Biden. Now a number of representatives of the military leadership are demanding to resume the program. In their opinion, such weapons can become the US response to the likely threat of the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia or China. In particular, the head of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces (STRATCOM), Admiral Ches Richard, sent a letter to the House of Representatives of Congress stating the need to continue the SLCM-N program.

Washington's naval nuclear component now consists of ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads placed on submarines.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.06 20:57
  • 0
Комментарий к ""Ядерными" бомбардировщиками Tornado, возможно, заменят Су-24 на Украине"
  • 20.06 20:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рютте рассказал о создании НАТО 3.0" и "Пентагон заявил о необходимости перезагрузки альянса до «НАТО 3.0»"
  • 20.06 16:51
  • 5
Заглушенные Россией спутники Starlink получили «необратимые повреждения»
  • 20.06 16:49
  • 14
Запад готовится к превентивным ударам по базам ВМФ России, заявил Патрушев
  • 20.06 13:21
  • 16130
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.06 06:09
  • 0
Запад никогда не желал сильной Украины (AgoraVox, Франция)
  • 20.06 02:40
  • 0
Комментарий к "Террористический расчет: зачем Киев устроил налет на Москву во время саммита в Казани"
  • 20.06 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия сбила почти тысячу украинских дронов за сутки. Что дальше?"
  • 19.06 23:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Я давно убежден, что слов недостаточно». Лавров сделал заявление после крупнейшей за два года атаки ВСУ на Москву"
  • 19.06 22:33
  • 0
О БЭКах как классе оружия.
  • 19.06 17:19
  • 3
Why are Russian satellites better for their Starlink
  • 18.06 16:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "Журналист рассказал о «свинцовом облаке» для защиты ядерных ракет"
  • 18.06 16:09
  • 1138
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 18.06 05:40
  • 1
The military commander called for strikes on bridges and the elimination of the leadership of Ukraine
  • 18.06 02:12
  • 0
О Черноморском флоте в ходе СВО. Ценность, участие, потери.