Войти

The US Navy opposes the additional placement of nuclear weapons on ships and submarines

1635
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Navy opposes the additional deployment of sea-based nuclear weapons on ships and submarines. Their representatives believe that it is better to spend these funds on something more necessary, for example, on hypersound.

According to the press service of the United States Navy, this opinion was expressed by the chief of Naval Operations Admiral Mike Gilday in his speech to members of the US Congress.

The deployment of nuclear weapons on surface ships and submarines can be carried out, and among the leadership of the US Department of Defense, many support the idea of developing this type of sea-based weapons. But Gilday believes that equipping the fleet with nuclear weapons will sideline other, more important tasks.

Image source: topwar.ru

During the administration of Donald Trump, the United States began to create a new sea-based cruise missile with a nuclear warhead (SLCM-N), but this program was suspended under Biden. Now a number of representatives of the military leadership are demanding to resume the program. In their opinion, such weapons can become the US response to the likely threat of the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia or China. In particular, the head of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces (STRATCOM), Admiral Ches Richard, sent a letter to the House of Representatives of Congress stating the need to continue the SLCM-N program.

Washington's naval nuclear component now consists of ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads placed on submarines.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.02 07:14
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США сочли Су-57 спорным истребителем"
  • 03.02 06:26
  • 1
Пентагон и Белый дом разработали планы военной атаки на Иран
  • 03.02 06:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Двигатель для Су-57: в индийской прессе указали срок готовности АЛ-51Ф1"
  • 03.02 05:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО без Америки: Европа "осознает немыслимое" (Financial Times, Великобритания)"
  • 03.02 05:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Крупнейший в мире парк танков Т-64 в конфликте с Россией: каковы результаты? (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 03.02 03:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медведев отметил военную победу России в СВО по нескольким параметрам"
  • 03.02 00:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Минобороны Украины и НАТО определили приоритеты сотрудничества"
  • 02.02 23:57
  • 6
Комментарий к "Время гвардейских танковых дивизий безвозвратно ушло"
  • 02.02 21:02
  • 13963
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.02 18:14
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России оценили одно достижение разработчиков «Абрамса»"
  • 01.02 12:53
  • 10
"The time of the Guards tank divisions is irrevocably gone"
  • 31.01 21:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Три сценария развития конфликта на Украине в 2026 году от американской прессы"
  • 31.01 17:03
  • 1
Новый «Кукурузник» совершит первый полет в этом году
  • 31.01 16:11
  • 2
Китайский аналог российской Р-37М показали крупным планом
  • 31.01 10:01
  • 2
Технологии «Буревестника» применили в космических программах