Войти

The US Navy opposes the additional placement of nuclear weapons on ships and submarines

1664
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Navy opposes the additional deployment of sea-based nuclear weapons on ships and submarines. Their representatives believe that it is better to spend these funds on something more necessary, for example, on hypersound.

According to the press service of the United States Navy, this opinion was expressed by the chief of Naval Operations Admiral Mike Gilday in his speech to members of the US Congress.

The deployment of nuclear weapons on surface ships and submarines can be carried out, and among the leadership of the US Department of Defense, many support the idea of developing this type of sea-based weapons. But Gilday believes that equipping the fleet with nuclear weapons will sideline other, more important tasks.

Image source: topwar.ru

During the administration of Donald Trump, the United States began to create a new sea-based cruise missile with a nuclear warhead (SLCM-N), but this program was suspended under Biden. Now a number of representatives of the military leadership are demanding to resume the program. In their opinion, such weapons can become the US response to the likely threat of the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia or China. In particular, the head of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces (STRATCOM), Admiral Ches Richard, sent a letter to the House of Representatives of Congress stating the need to continue the SLCM-N program.

Washington's naval nuclear component now consists of ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads placed on submarines.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 23.02 02:24
  • 14609
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 23.02 00:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "МиГ-23Б (32-24) – истребитель с крылом изменяемой стреловидности"
  • 22.02 22:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российский Ту-22М3 назвали самолетом завтрашнего дня", и к "«Отвечает требованиям завтрашнего дня»: военэксперт о роли Ту-22М3 на СВО"
  • 22.02 19:13
  • 22
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 22.02 15:22
  • 1
MiG-23B (32-24) – fighter with a variable sweep wing
  • 21.02 20:17
  • 1
Танк Т-90М очень хорош, а Т-90М2 должен быть еще лучше
  • 21.02 05:27
  • 0
К вопросу о "стратегических" и "дальних" бомбардировщиках.
  • 21.02 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США рассказали о «трудном выживании» российских Ту-22М3"
  • 20.02 14:09
  • 1
В России разработают гусеничный аэропорт для дронов
  • 20.02 12:55
  • 1
Комментарий к "Российский «Триумф» назвали головной болью НАТО"
  • 19.02 20:26
  • 0
Комментарий к "Аналитики предупреждают: Су-35 с ракетами увеличенной дальности угрожают превосходству НАТО в воздухе (Business Insider, Германия)"
  • 19.02 18:15
  • 1579
Корпорация "Иркут" до конца 2018 года поставит ВКС РФ более 30 истребителей Су-30СМ
  • 19.02 18:12
  • 67
CEO of UAC Slyusar: SSJ New tests with Russian engines will begin in the fall - TASS interview
  • 19.02 15:50
  • 16
"The Navy will break through the blockade." Patrushev — on the protection of navigation and maritime borders of the Russian Federation
  • 19.02 15:07
  • 2
Около 20 новых самолетов МС-21-310 находятся в процессе сборки