Войти

"Montana" passed the first exam

2502
1
-1

The American Navy will soon receive the 21st Virginia-type nuclear submarine. Yesterday, February 8, the portal navalnews.com He reported that Huntington Ingalls Industries announced the successful completion of sea trials of the Montana submarine (SSN 794).

The tests included the first dive of the submarine and high-speed maneuvers in surface and underwater positions. If there are no problems during further tests, the US Navy will receive a new submarine at the end of this year.

Montana submarine on sea trials

Image source: navalnews.com

USS Montana is the 21st Virginia-class submarine built for the US Navy, and the third of ten Block IV modification boats. It was planned to transfer the submarine to the US navy by the end of 2021, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadlines were shifted.

Virginia-type submarines are designed to combat submarines at great depths (up to 500 m), as well as for actions in the coastal zone. "Virginias" can conduct reconnaissance, deliver special-purpose units to the coast, carry out jamming and underwater mining, as well as perform other types of underwater work (in particular, search and rescue). The submarine is equipped with Tomahawk cruise missile launchers and torpedo tubes. The crew of the submarine has 134 people.

The length of the Virginia-type submarines is 114.9 m, width - 10.3 m, displacement - 7800 tons. The maximum diving depth exceeds 500 m. The S9G nuclear reactor, designed for 33 years of continuous operation, generates enough energy for the jet propulsion to reach a speed of 25 knots (46 km/h). Each subsequent modification of submarines has minor differences in layout, armament and crew composition.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Comments [1]
№1
10.02.2022 13:33
Хорошие, а главное реальные планы строительства флота.

Россия не смогла даже чуть - чуть приблизится к формированию самодостаточных группировок  многоцелевых АПЛ на ТОФ и СФ, сорвав при этом даже не самые амбициозные планы.
-модернизация 4-х АПЛ пр. 971 провалена
- модернизация 4-х АПЛ пр. 949 провалена
- строительство 8-ми АПЛ пр. 885 до 21г.
пока в строю только две АПЛ.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.06 15:37
  • 16028
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 05.06 14:18
  • 2
На Западе оценили ракетную мощь российского «Адмирала Нахимова»
  • 05.06 03:24
  • 1
Эксперт исключил массовое применение «Цирконов» для ударов по Украине
  • 05.06 02:43
  • 1
Кто мешает обеспечивать глобальную продовольственную безопасность?
  • 05.06 02:38
  • 0
Комментарий к "World’s Largest Combat Ship Begins Final Sea Trials: How Powerful is Russia’s Nuclear-Powered Cruiser Admiral Nakhimov?" и "The World’s Only Nuclear Surface Combat Ship is Now Heavily Optimised to Defend the Russian Arctic "
  • 04.06 06:30
  • 0
О Петровском (т.е. построенном при Петре I) ВМФ
  • 04.06 06:16
  • 1
Vadim Badekha: We took off all the planes that the country was waiting for.
  • 04.06 05:55
  • 4
Russian Northern Fleet Day
  • 04.06 03:04
  • 1
"We have full confidence that everything planned will be implemented"
  • 03.06 12:36
  • 1
В ОАК сообщили о начале сборки опытного образца истребителя Checkmate
  • 03.06 12:26
  • 1
Армия России в ответ на атаки Киева поразила завод «Мотор Сич» в Запорожье
  • 03.06 05:26
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украинский конфликт стал европейским. Нельзя думать об одном лишь выживании (The Economist, Великобритания)"
  • 03.06 04:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Удары по этим объектам ранее не наносились». Как Россия может усилить атаки на Украину"
  • 03.06 03:40
  • 1
"These facilities have not been hit before." How Russia can step up attacks on Ukraine
  • 03.06 03:38
  • 1
The Ukrainian conflict has become a European one. You can't just think about survival (The Economist, UK)