Войти

In Grozny, the Russian ZSU "Shilka" ruthlessly mowed down the militants

5558
0
0

Image source: Photo: © Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

During the operation to liberate Grozny in January 1995, Russian troops, along with anti-aircraft missile and cannon "Tunguska", also used older ZSU "Shilka".

After the city was almost cleared of illegal formations, it was possible to communicate there with the fighters who fought on the ZSU-23-4. They admitted that before the start of this war they had no idea what kind of fighting they would have to conduct. Of course, it was known that machines of their type were successfully used in Afghanistan, but in combat training they focused more on countering enemy aircraft and helicopters.

The first target they managed to hit were snipers firing from a multi-storey building. A short salvo from a quadruple 23-mm cannon, and the militants were silenced forever. And in the course of other battles, they had to "mow down" Dudaev.

The big disadvantage of the "Shilka", in their opinion, was its insufficient security - vulnerability even from a large-caliber machine gun. The ideal option would be a tank-based combat vehicle with a pair of 30 mm guns and a good sighting system that would act confidently, including at night.

Interestingly, according to the experience of the first Chechen in Chelyabinsk, a Viper tank support vehicle was created based on the T-72AV, just with 2A72 guns, but everything was limited to the production of a prototype and in the second war Grozny had to be stormed using the same equipment as before.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"
  • 31.07 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия потерпеть поражение в Первой Мировой Войне?"
  • 31.07 01:56
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Суворов взял «неприступный» Измаил, имея меньше солдат, чем защитников"
  • 31.07 01:37
  • 1
What can Europe expect from the US-conceived “NATO 3.0”? (The Spectator, UK)
  • 31.07 01:19
  • 1
Болгария подключилась к нефтепроводу НАТО (Дума, Болгария)
  • 31.07 01:15
  • 3
На Украине отмечают рост у ВС РФ количества средств для противодействия Starlink
  • 30.07 23:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина полюбила “Великую Америку”. Но не факт, что та отвечает взаимностью (Politico, США)"
  • 30.07 20:31
  • 0
КомментариИ к "Вечные темы для споров: победное шествие советской власти"
  • 30.07 20:29
  • 1
Комментарий к "Почему современная философия бесполезна? Как возродить её практическую силу"
  • 30.07 18:06
  • 2
Комментарий к "Страсти по «Арене-М»: изобрела ли Россия панацею для защиты танков от FPV-дронов?"
  • 30.07 16:19
  • 1
Принцип работы глушителя ВС России спутников Starlink объяснили
  • 30.07 15:58
  • 1
Объявлено о воссоздании Высшего училища подводников
  • 30.07 15:31
  • 16346
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 30.07 15:20
  • 8
Дуров: Чиновнику, «сломавшему интернет» в РФ, американцы должны вручить медаль