Войти

Tank losses in Chechnya, including due to the lack of dynamic protection

3394
0
0

Image source: vestnik-rm.ru

In the Soviet tank industry, great attention was traditionally paid to the characteristics of protection. For example, since the mid-80s, tanks produced in the USSR began to receive first mounted, and later built-in dynamic protection, which significantly reduced the effectiveness of anti-tank ammunition produced at that time: RPG and LNG rocket-propelled grenades, anti-tank guided missiles, artillery shells.

However, it so happened that not all tanks involved in the initial stage of the first Chechen war were equipped with this very dynamic protection. For example, the T-72A of the 131st Maikop brigade did not have it. And on many combat vehicles that arrived from the North Caucasus Military District, there was also no "Contact-1", and among them there were even old T-72 "Ural" with optical rangefinders.

Unfortunately, not everything was fine with the T-80, for example, together with the T-80BV, the T-80B without "reactive armor" were delivered from the Leningrad District to the conflict zone.

At the same time, it was not without the traditional sloppiness, in the tank battalion of one of the motorized rifle regiments there were characteristic "boxes" on the equipment, but, as it turned out, empty. The fighters did not have time to equip them before storming Grozny. Therefore, is it worth being surprised by sufficiently high losses?

But there were also command mistakes, insufficient training of personnel, there was no proper interaction. Nevertheless, despite everything, the army then fulfilled its task - Grozny was cleared of militants.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.07 01:42
  • 1
В США рассказали о новой роли Су-57
  • 03.07 01:32
  • 1
FT: Европа хочет использовать оборонный потенциал Турции на фоне разлада с США
  • 02.07 19:21
  • 53
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 02.07 15:09
  • 16223
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.07 12:08
  • 4
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 02.07 05:07
  • 1
Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО
  • 01.07 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)
  • 01.07 00:22
  • 2
Комментарий к "В России предложен новый способ борьбы с авианосцами США"
  • 30.06 23:56
  • 1
Британия отказалась от новых эсминцев в пользу гибридных кораблей с БЛА
  • 30.06 23:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО под давлением, Европе предстоит крупнейшее перевооружение в истории (El Pais, Испания)"
  • 30.06 22:57
  • 1
В США оценили воздушный компонент ядерной триады России