Войти

US weapons causing Russia a "headache" are named

4353
0
0
Image source: Фото: Christopher Senenk / U.S. Navy / Getty Images

The United States is capable of sending up to six thousand high-precision subsonic Tomahawk cruise missiles with conventional and nuclear warheads to the target in just one salvo, writes TASS military columnist Dmitry Litovkin. The author called this circumstance causing an impenetrable headache for Russia.

"To repel such an attack does not seem real yet," the author notes.

The observer recalls that the United States has about 70 Arleigh Burke-type destroyers armed with Tomahawk missiles. "They surf the seas and oceans, are constantly near the Russian borders, including in the Black Sea. This makes Prompt Global Strike our persistent headache — they can strike at any moment," the author writes.

Nevertheless, Litovkin notes that American Tomahawk missiles in Syria "entered the target, as they say, from the rear, flying around Russian anti-aircraft missile systems," because "otherwise, only a few could have reached the target."

The observer admits that the Russian S-500 Prometheus system may turn out to be "another confirmation of a technological breakthrough" in the possibility of preventing a massive missile strike by non-nuclear means. "The scale of the issue is clear — the possibility of a massive missile strike by non-nuclear means dominates us like the sword of Damocles," the author writes.

In October, TASS, citing a source, reported that the first brigade set of S-500 "Prometheus" entered the troops of the 15th Special Purpose Army of the Aerospace Forces (VKS) of Russia, which is on combat duty for the protection and defense of aerospace space over Moscow.


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 06.10 07:28
  • 1
Польша представила новую тяжелую боевую машину пехоты
  • 06.10 06:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Пушка «Арматы» оказалась хуже советской – всего 800 выстрелов и 125 мм. А куда делась «царь-пушка» для «царь-танка»?"
  • 06.10 04:28
  • 1
The Ukrainian Armed Forces have prepared a "war plan" with Russia for 30 years. How Drapaty is changing the army
  • 05.10 23:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Заказан головной итальянский эсминец нового поколения"
  • 05.10 17:36
  • 0
С широко закрытыми глазами
  • 05.10 15:13
  • 1
The lead Italian destroyer of the new generation has been ordered
  • 05.10 14:51
  • 1
Hunters of the "small sky"
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"