Войти

Soviet "Nuclear BMP" - "Units" could receive missiles with special warheads

4099
0
+1

Image source: vestnik-rm.ru

Soviet first-generation IFVs in the late 60s were considered by military theorists as a means of delivering infantry in a full-scale nuclear war.

Contrary to popular myths in the West, the Soviet Union never planned to be the first to attack NATO countries.

At the same time, if the troops of the North Atlantic Alliance had invaded the GDR and Czechoslovakia, they would have been waiting for a crushing retaliatory strike. Moreover, counterattacking formations would not save on nuclear ammunition. However, the enemy would not have remained in debt. In addition to tactical nuclear weapons used by artillery and aviation, the possibility of equipping the M60A2 and M551 tanks with 152-mm guided missiles with special combat units was considered.

Apparently, under the impression of these plans, similar developments were carried out in the USSR. For example, a combat vehicle armed with 150-kilogram nuclear missiles with 0.3-kiloton warheads was supposed to appear on the basis of the BMP-1. Their flight range is 8000 meters. The T-64A tank was to receive a similar launcher.

Perhaps this equipment would have entered the troops, but, apparently, due to the fact that the Americans refused such weapons, these works were stopped.

Dmitry Lemeshko

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 07:56
  • 12705
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 05.01 07:09
  • 1
Ковальчук оценил перспективу лететь на Марс в ближайшем будущем
  • 05.01 06:53
  • 1
"Уралвагонзавод" отправил в войска эшелон с новой партией танков Т-90М "Прорыв"
  • 05.01 06:44
  • 1
Израиль прикроют «Железным лучом»
  • 05.01 06:42
  • 1
В России оценили опасность комплексов Patriot словами «никакое не вундерваффе»
  • 05.01 06:40
  • 1
Russian sky is a fortress: How can NATO counter A2/AD and Russia's air defense system? (The National Interest, USA)
  • 05.01 06:16
  • 1
Five hotbeds of tension (one of them in Europe), which could trigger World War III in 2026 (Daily Star, UK)
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15