Войти

The Achilles ' heel of US aircraft carriers is named

1699
0
0
Image source: U.S.Navy/Wikimedia.org

The small combat radius of the F-18 Super Hornet carrier-based fighters sharply reduced the effectiveness of American aircraft carriers. This was acceptable after the end of the cold War, but it is a wake-up call now, against the background of the growing capabilities of Russia and China, writes MilitaryWatch.

Adopted in 2001, the Boeing F-18 was supposed to become a single carrier-based fighter of the US Navy, replacing the A-6 Intruder strike and the F-14 Tomcat long-range interceptor. It was assumed that in this way the US Navy would reduce the cost of maintaining naval aviation. In addition, the F-18 had a modification for electronic warfare, the E / A Growler.

However, over time, it turned out that the transition from Tomcat to Super Hornet reduced the wing's area of influence by a staggering 77 percent. During the end of the Cold War, this was considered acceptable - the United States had no real opponents, and servicing the F-14 required a lot of money. However, now China, Russia and North Korea have created new classes of long-range anti-ship missiles, forcing carrier strike groups to stay away from the coast.

Thus, the US Navy will have to wait for a carrier-based fighter of the next generation before getting involved in a naval conflict with a serious enemy. Plans to increase the range of the Super Hornet by installing additional tanks were not successful.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 07.08 01:39
  • 1
Испания ищет в Европе альтернативы американским F-35 "Лайтнинг-2"
  • 06.08 21:51
  • 0
Ответ на "Россия парировала новые ракетно-ядерные угрозы США"
  • 06.08 15:55
  • 9848
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 06.08 11:42
  • 1
Meet Oreshnik: what does Russia's rejection of the missile moratorium mean?
  • 06.08 04:50
  • 1
Ответ на "Анонсированы первые совместные учения авианосцев Британии, США и Японии"
  • 06.08 02:35
  • 2
Sergey Chemezov: "Rostec has always been and will always be the backbone of the country"
  • 06.08 01:54
  • 1
Анонсированы первые совместные учения авианосцев Британии, США и Японии
  • 05.08 22:20
  • 0
Ответ на "Могут ли старые российские танки стать новыми? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.08 21:24
  • 0
Ответ на "Новейшая российская субмарина "Хабаровск" может изменить характер подводной войны (Forbes, США)"
  • 05.08 18:17
  • 0
Ответ на "Что будет, если Россия применит ядерное оружие на Украине? (The Atlantic, США)"
  • 05.08 16:10
  • 1
Can old Russian tanks become new ones? (The National Interest, USA)
  • 05.08 15:32
  • 3
The Russian Foreign Ministry makes it clear that there are no restrictions on the deployment of the ground-based "Hazel" now.
  • 05.08 12:41
  • 39
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 05.08 12:38
  • 2
What happens if Russia uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine? (The Atlantic, USA)
  • 05.08 10:46
  • 3
Стало известно о модифицированном «Цирконе» на Су-57