Войти

The Achilles ' heel of US aircraft carriers is named

2136
0
0
Image source: U.S.Navy/Wikimedia.org

The small combat radius of the F-18 Super Hornet carrier-based fighters sharply reduced the effectiveness of American aircraft carriers. This was acceptable after the end of the cold War, but it is a wake-up call now, against the background of the growing capabilities of Russia and China, writes MilitaryWatch.

Adopted in 2001, the Boeing F-18 was supposed to become a single carrier-based fighter of the US Navy, replacing the A-6 Intruder strike and the F-14 Tomcat long-range interceptor. It was assumed that in this way the US Navy would reduce the cost of maintaining naval aviation. In addition, the F-18 had a modification for electronic warfare, the E / A Growler.

However, over time, it turned out that the transition from Tomcat to Super Hornet reduced the wing's area of influence by a staggering 77 percent. During the end of the Cold War, this was considered acceptable - the United States had no real opponents, and servicing the F-14 required a lot of money. However, now China, Russia and North Korea have created new classes of long-range anti-ship missiles, forcing carrier strike groups to stay away from the coast.

Thus, the US Navy will have to wait for a carrier-based fighter of the next generation before getting involved in a naval conflict with a serious enemy. Plans to increase the range of the Super Hornet by installing additional tanks were not successful.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 13.04 03:08
Комментарий к "Возрождение Третьего Рейха, или сатанинские* звезды над Германией…"
  • 13.04 02:08
  • 1
На Украине показали БЭК-авианосец
  • 13.04 01:53
  • 1
Trump lost his temper and snapped at Rutte over NATO's inaction on Iran (Politico, USA)
  • 13.04 01:38
  • 1
The ice has broken, or a naughty pet from the Baltic States
  • 12.04 21:13
  • 1066
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 12.04 19:45
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Пока не возьмем на абордаж, не успокоятся». Запад готовит тотальную морскую блокаду России"
  • 12.04 13:45
  • 15503
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 12.04 07:58
  • 1
Что необходимо самолетам 5 и 6-го поколений без учета малозаметности. И какие страны в этом впереди.
  • 12.04 02:38
  • 0
Каковы перспективы боевой авиации без "малозаметности".
  • 12.04 02:08
  • 1
Комментарий к "США возвращаются к авиации 4 поколения. Почему? Разбираемся в проблеме"
  • 11.04 20:03
  • 2
The ships went: the frigate Admiral Grigorovich took two of our tankers through the English Channel
  • 11.04 19:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Алжирский Су-57 впервые показали на качественном снимке"
  • 10.04 19:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ад разверзся: Зеленский взмолился о пощаде. Русские только вошли во вкус"
  • 10.04 18:49
  • 1
The structural collapse of NATO is the result of separation from reality (The Spectator, UK)
  • 10.04 17:35
  • 0
Комментарий на взгляд из 2021 г. (Чжунго цзюньван (Китай): США и Россия «демонстрируют друг другу» асимметричную боевую мощь)