Войти

The Achilles ' heel of US aircraft carriers is named

1993
0
0
Image source: U.S.Navy/Wikimedia.org

The small combat radius of the F-18 Super Hornet carrier-based fighters sharply reduced the effectiveness of American aircraft carriers. This was acceptable after the end of the cold War, but it is a wake-up call now, against the background of the growing capabilities of Russia and China, writes MilitaryWatch.

Adopted in 2001, the Boeing F-18 was supposed to become a single carrier-based fighter of the US Navy, replacing the A-6 Intruder strike and the F-14 Tomcat long-range interceptor. It was assumed that in this way the US Navy would reduce the cost of maintaining naval aviation. In addition, the F-18 had a modification for electronic warfare, the E / A Growler.

However, over time, it turned out that the transition from Tomcat to Super Hornet reduced the wing's area of influence by a staggering 77 percent. During the end of the Cold War, this was considered acceptable - the United States had no real opponents, and servicing the F-14 required a lot of money. However, now China, Russia and North Korea have created new classes of long-range anti-ship missiles, forcing carrier strike groups to stay away from the coast.

Thus, the US Navy will have to wait for a carrier-based fighter of the next generation before getting involved in a naval conflict with a serious enemy. Plans to increase the range of the Super Hornet by installing additional tanks were not successful.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 13.02 03:59
  • 0
Ответ на "Стратегические изменения в российской армии и их влияние на западные прогнозы (An Nahar, Ливан)"
  • 12.02 22:41
  • 14188
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 12.02 21:44
  • 2
If the "Cart" gets up: questions from the military and reflections of military officers
  • 12.02 20:25
  • 0
Комментарий к "Сегодняшний кризис НАТО – это также и кризис американской культуры (Le Monde, Франция)"
  • 12.02 15:01
  • 85
"To break through island chains." China has given a powerful response to the Pentagon
  • 12.02 08:45
  • 1572
Корпорация "Иркут" до конца 2018 года поставит ВКС РФ более 30 истребителей Су-30СМ
  • 12.02 08:12
  • 99
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 12.02 06:41
  • 0
Комментарий на "Контракты на экспорт российских истребителей Су-57 на Ближний Восток "уже есть". Самый вероятный заказчик — Иран (Military Watch Magazine, США)", и "СМИ предрекли смещение баланса сил на Ближнем Востоке при продаже Су-57"
  • 12.02 05:49
  • 1
Комментарий к "Как становится лучше истребитель Су-57"
  • 12.02 05:01
  • 1
В «Ростехе» оценили эффективность антидронового «Зубра»
  • 12.02 04:48
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром Беларуси представляет ударный беспилотный комплекс нового поколения "Квадро-М"
  • 12.02 01:53
  • 1
The Limits of Russian-Ukrainian-American negotiations (Stratfor, USA)
  • 12.02 01:46
  • 0
По поводу направлений совершенствования тактической авиации РФ.
  • 12.02 00:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Линкор класса "Трамп" против "Адмирала Нахимова" (The National Interest, США)"
  • 11.02 22:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США оценили «морских терминаторов» из России"