Войти

The Achilles ' heel of US aircraft carriers is named

1976
0
0
Image source: U.S.Navy/Wikimedia.org

The small combat radius of the F-18 Super Hornet carrier-based fighters sharply reduced the effectiveness of American aircraft carriers. This was acceptable after the end of the cold War, but it is a wake-up call now, against the background of the growing capabilities of Russia and China, writes MilitaryWatch.

Adopted in 2001, the Boeing F-18 was supposed to become a single carrier-based fighter of the US Navy, replacing the A-6 Intruder strike and the F-14 Tomcat long-range interceptor. It was assumed that in this way the US Navy would reduce the cost of maintaining naval aviation. In addition, the F-18 had a modification for electronic warfare, the E / A Growler.

However, over time, it turned out that the transition from Tomcat to Super Hornet reduced the wing's area of influence by a staggering 77 percent. During the end of the Cold War, this was considered acceptable - the United States had no real opponents, and servicing the F-14 required a lot of money. However, now China, Russia and North Korea have created new classes of long-range anti-ship missiles, forcing carrier strike groups to stay away from the coast.

Thus, the US Navy will have to wait for a carrier-based fighter of the next generation before getting involved in a naval conflict with a serious enemy. Plans to increase the range of the Super Hornet by installing additional tanks were not successful.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.02 21:02
  • 13963
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.02 18:47
  • 5
Комментарий к "Время гвардейских танковых дивизий безвозвратно ушло"
  • 02.02 18:14
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России оценили одно достижение разработчиков «Абрамса»"
  • 01.02 12:53
  • 10
"The time of the Guards tank divisions is irrevocably gone"
  • 31.01 21:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Три сценария развития конфликта на Украине в 2026 году от американской прессы"
  • 31.01 17:03
  • 1
Новый «Кукурузник» совершит первый полет в этом году
  • 31.01 16:11
  • 2
Китайский аналог российской Р-37М показали крупным планом
  • 31.01 10:01
  • 2
Технологии «Буревестника» применили в космических программах
  • 30.01 17:41
  • 2
В России оценили развитие «железных сердец» танков
  • 30.01 07:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гренландия не обеспечит Америке безопасность в Арктике. А этот регион обеспечит (The Washington Post, США)"
  • 30.01 03:01
  • 1
Greenland will not provide America with security in the Arctic. And this region will provide (The Washington Post, USA)
  • 30.01 02:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Военный историк Найтцель предупреждает: "Мы не должны недооценивать Россию" (Bild, Германия)"
  • 30.01 01:50
  • 1
На верфи ST Engineering заложен киль второго корабля MRCV для ВМС Сингапура
  • 30.01 01:35
  • 1
Глава военного комитета НАТО высказался против европейской армии
  • 30.01 01:25
  • 1
Three scenarios for the development of the conflict in Ukraine in 2026 from the American press