Войти

The Achilles ' heel of US aircraft carriers is named

2512
0
0
Image source: U.S.Navy/Wikimedia.org

The small combat radius of the F-18 Super Hornet carrier-based fighters sharply reduced the effectiveness of American aircraft carriers. This was acceptable after the end of the cold War, but it is a wake-up call now, against the background of the growing capabilities of Russia and China, writes MilitaryWatch.

Adopted in 2001, the Boeing F-18 was supposed to become a single carrier-based fighter of the US Navy, replacing the A-6 Intruder strike and the F-14 Tomcat long-range interceptor. It was assumed that in this way the US Navy would reduce the cost of maintaining naval aviation. In addition, the F-18 had a modification for electronic warfare, the E / A Growler.

However, over time, it turned out that the transition from Tomcat to Super Hornet reduced the wing's area of influence by a staggering 77 percent. During the end of the Cold War, this was considered acceptable - the United States had no real opponents, and servicing the F-14 required a lot of money. However, now China, Russia and North Korea have created new classes of long-range anti-ship missiles, forcing carrier strike groups to stay away from the coast.

Thus, the US Navy will have to wait for a carrier-based fighter of the next generation before getting involved in a naval conflict with a serious enemy. Plans to increase the range of the Super Hornet by installing additional tanks were not successful.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 16.09 19:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украинский след"
  • 16.09 18:20
  • 1
Россия может создать многоразовый лунный аппарат нового типа к 2040 году
  • 16.09 17:49
  • 2
Начальник бронетанкового управления МО РБ: современному танку альтернативы в ближайшей перспективе не будет
  • 16.09 11:03
  • 0
Украинский след
  • 16.09 05:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "От Москвы до Киева: Трамп ведет к миру или новой эскалации? (Al Jazeera, Катар)"
  • 16.09 01:52
  • 1
Russia's new weapons have already changed the course of its military operations. The West recognized its effectiveness and called it a complete surprise for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
  • 16.09 01:27
  • 1
From Moscow to Kiev: Is Trump leading to peace or a new escalation? (Al Jazeera, Qatar)
  • 15.09 20:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Начальник бронетанкового управления МО РБ: современному танку альтернативы в ближайшей перспективе не будет"
  • 15.09 18:26
  • 4
The rapid modernization of the Russian nuclear submarine fleet has alerted NATO (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 15.09 15:43
  • 1
"Fighter" with character: An armored buggy designed for military supply and medical personnel
  • 15.09 14:10
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему танки не устарели из-за дронов и продолжат применяться в будущем?"
  • 15.09 13:13
  • 1
"Rostec": it's time to train pre-engineers
  • 15.09 12:49
  • 0
Работа на результат
  • 15.09 12:41
  • 0
Тяжело в учении…
  • 15.09 09:43
  • 1
Leading foreign policy expert Suhasini Haidar: "It seems that in the G7 everything boils down to racial issues and the dominance of the old powers" (Berliner Zeitung, Germany)