Войти

British nuclear-powered submarines can be transferred to Brest

4051
0
+1
Image source: vpk-news.ru

The UK Ministry of Defense is considering the possibility of deploying its submarines with a nuclear arsenal on US or French military bases in the event of Scotland gaining independence. This was reported on September 1 by the Financial Times newspaper.

According to the sources of the publication, the discussion of plans to move submarines with Trident-type ballistic missiles, which are now based in Scotland, was conducted in the recent past. 

As a result, three options for action were developed. The first involves placing submarines in another British port. However, back in 2014, before the first referendum on Scottish independence, the Joint Royal Institute for Security and Defense Research (RUSI) estimated the cost of such a plan at £ 3-4 billion.

The second option involves the deployment of submarines on the territory of one of the allied countries. The American naval base Kings Bay in Georgia or the base of French nuclear submarines on the Ile Long Peninsula near the port city of Brest are called as possible locations for the British nuclear fleet.

The third option, called "nuclear Gibraltar", provides for negotiations with an independent Scotland and granting the Faslane and Coolport naval bases in the region the status of British Overseas territories.

As noted in the article, the Ministry of Defense stated that there are no plans to move the nuclear arsenal from Scotland. However, several senior officials, whose names are not given, expressed to the newspaper the opinion that these plans show how difficult the elections will face the UK government if Scotland gains full independence.

However, Eadaily notes, London is not going to give Edinburgh such a right yet, considering that the Scots have already made their choice seven years ago. At that time, at least 55% of the participants in the independence referendum supported the preservation of the union between Edinburgh and London.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.08 21:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Кто победит в дуэли Су-57 против Dassault Rafale? Ответ может удивить (The National Interest, США)"
  • 21.08 21:30
  • 135
Обзор программы создания Ил-114-300
  • 21.08 18:02
  • 0
Комментарий к " "Именно этого Москва не хочет". Этим учением НАТО посылает четкий сигнал (Die Welt, Германия)"
  • 21.08 18:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Америка должна выйти из НАТО и перестать играть роль мирового жандарма на Ближнем Востоке (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 21.08 17:05
  • 16388
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.08 14:33
  • 2
"Field artillery of the future": AS9 Huntsman self-propelled guns entered the Australian Army
  • 21.08 14:11
  • 3
Putin teases NATO with a warship with hypersonic missiles on board (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 21.08 13:55
  • 3
В России приступили к сборке первых самолетов Як-130М
  • 21.08 13:33
  • 2
Ужесточены требования к импортозамещению в судостроении
  • 21.08 11:30
  • 1
МО РФ прокомментировало удары по Киеву фразой «Приводим убедительные доводы»
  • 21.08 07:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Трамп дал Путину возможность атаковать НАТО (Rolling Stone, США)"
  • 21.08 02:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Смена нынешней идеологической повестки: от либерализма к монархизму и плачу о "потерянной России""
  • 21.08 01:17
  • 1
Зеленский пожаловался на «подорожание войны»
  • 20.08 20:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему САУ PzH 2000 в два раза мощнее Т-90М в современных конфликтах"
  • 20.08 05:09
  • 0
Комментарий к " "Нет значимых результатов" или почему боевое применение русских танков не правильно оценивают американские СМИ?"