Войти

In the United States, they called one giant problem of the Russian "Armata"

3636
0
-2
Image source: Фото: Евгений Одиноков / РИА Новости

The Russian T-14 Armata tank is terrible for the enemy, but it has one giant problem, writes the American publication 19FortyFive.

The publication claims that the new combat vehicle was created almost from scratch, and was not based on"past developments of Soviet times". In particular, the T-14 Armata received an uninhabited combat module, a 125-mm 2A82-1M smoothbore cannon, the latest active protection system and laser-guided ammunition.

The publication calls the main problem of the Russian tank the lack of its mass production, which, in turn, is due to a lack of funding. So, the magazine is not sure that Russia will be able to annually produce one hundred T-14 Armata.

In June, the Defense Express agency wrote that according to its characteristics, the secret Ukrainian tank "Nota", if it existed in reality, would be superior to the Russian T-14 "Armata".

In May, the American magazine The National Interest named four of the most powerful tanks in the world: the German Leopard 2 A7+, the American M1 Abrams, the South Korean K2 Black Panther and the Russian T-14 Armata.

In March, the same publication wrote that the Victory parade in Moscow will be represented by the most deadly weapons of Russia T-14 "Armata", a fighter of the fifth generation su-57, anti-aircraft missile system s-400 "Triumph", hypersonic aircraft missile system 9-A-7660 "Dagger" and the T-90M.


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.02 23:11
  • 14587
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.02 20:17
  • 1
Танк Т-90М очень хорош, а Т-90М2 должен быть еще лучше
  • 21.02 05:27
  • 0
К вопросу о "стратегических" и "дальних" бомбардировщиках.
  • 21.02 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США рассказали о «трудном выживании» российских Ту-22М3"
  • 20.02 19:34
  • 20
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 20.02 14:09
  • 1
В России разработают гусеничный аэропорт для дронов
  • 20.02 12:55
  • 1
Комментарий к "Российский «Триумф» назвали головной болью НАТО"
  • 19.02 20:26
  • 0
Комментарий к "Аналитики предупреждают: Су-35 с ракетами увеличенной дальности угрожают превосходству НАТО в воздухе (Business Insider, Германия)"
  • 19.02 18:15
  • 1579
Корпорация "Иркут" до конца 2018 года поставит ВКС РФ более 30 истребителей Су-30СМ
  • 19.02 18:12
  • 67
CEO of UAC Slyusar: SSJ New tests with Russian engines will begin in the fall - TASS interview
  • 19.02 15:50
  • 16
"The Navy will break through the blockade." Patrushev — on the protection of navigation and maritime borders of the Russian Federation
  • 19.02 15:07
  • 2
Около 20 новых самолетов МС-21-310 находятся в процессе сборки
  • 19.02 14:53
  • 7
Starlink отключена две недели, но это не повлияло на БПС, заявил Криворучко
  • 19.02 13:10
  • 1
В США рассказали о плавающих у баз ВМФ России американских подлодках
  • 19.02 13:06
  • 1
"The equipment is becoming more "toothy": the BTR-22 was evaluated in the Western press