Войти

The Spectator called the incident with the British destroyer Defender off the Crimea part of the NATO strategy

2418
0
0
Image source: © REUTERS / SERGEY SMOLENTSEV

MOSCOW, June 24-RIA Novosti. The world has witnessed the biggest escalation in relations between Russia and the UK since the Skripal case. So The Spectator columnist Tim Ogden commented on the recent incident with the British ship Defender.

"The presence of the British fleet may be part of a broader NATO strategy <...> the alliance intends to make it clear that it will continue to challenge Moscow, including through activity in the Black Sea," the journalist notes.

London is probably trying to define its role on the world stage, especially after leaving the European Union, but Moscow is equally ready to demonstrate its readiness to defend itself, Ogden believes.

"Naturally, the government will want to avoid a serious escalation of the conflict with Russia, because the idea of guaranteed mutual destruction in 2021 is as terrifyingly real as during the Cold War," the author of the article added.

A possible clash — and even casualties — will not automatically lead to the outbreak of war. At the same time, it will prove that the second Cold War has already begun, he concluded.

Earlier, the Russian Defense Ministry said that the British Navy destroyer Defender crossed the border and entered three kilometers into internal waters near Cape Fiolent (Crimea). After the Russian border patrol ship opened a warning fire, and the Su-24M aircraft made a "warning bombing" on the course of the destroyer, it left the country. The British Ministry of Defense said that the ship was making a peaceful passage through the territorial waters of Ukraine, there were no warning shots.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.04 08:03
  • 907
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 03.04 04:44
  • 0
Комментарии к "Как усилить защиту нефтяной инфраструктуры России", и "Недружественный огонь: как Россия ответит на украинские атаки на Усть-Лугу"
  • 03.04 03:42
  • 15325
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 03.04 02:42
  • 2
Западная пресса: «Россия выстроила кольцо ПВО вокруг Москвы»
  • 03.04 01:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Трёхходовка Нетаньяху. Трамп лишь ширма? Раскрыта стратегическая игра Израиля"
  • 02.04 18:35
  • 1
Kalibry guided Indonesia to Russian submarines
  • 02.04 18:30
  • 1
Российская «Скорлупа» поступила в зону СВО
  • 02.04 18:23
  • 1
How to strengthen the protection of Russia's oil infrastructure
  • 02.04 18:15
  • 1
Unfriendly fire: how Russia will respond to the Ukrainian attacks on Ust-Luga
  • 02.04 17:58
  • 112
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 02.04 17:38
  • 4
Новейший российский «Союз-5» впервые запустят 2 апреля
  • 02.04 17:34
  • 2
Experts explained the difference between the Apollo and Artemis lunar missions
  • 02.04 17:23
  • 1
Новый российский аналог Starlink: стоимость спутников может достигнуть 27 млрд рублей, а расходы на их запуск могут добавить еще десятки миллиардов
  • 02.04 03:51
  • 1
Merz goes into conflict with Trump: three main risks (Der Spiegel, Germany)
  • 01.04 21:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Как американские подводные лодки помогли США победить в холодной войне"