Войти

New Chinese aircraft carrier measured by satellite

3638
0
0
Image source: rg.ru

Judging by the dimensions of the lower part of the Chinese aircraft carrier Type 003, its dimensions do not differ much from the latest American ships of the Gerald R. Ford type. This conclusion was reached by the experts of Naval News, having studied satellite photos of the shipyard in Shanghai, where the aircraft carrier is being built.

According to the calculations of the publication, the length of the waterline Type 003 will be about 300 meters. This is slightly smaller than the Ford (317 meters), but significantly larger than the previous Chinese aircraft carriers (270 meters). Another significant difference between the new ship of the People's Republic of China and its predecessors will be the catapults. Type 001 and 002, built according to the Soviet project, use a springboard that does not allow heavy aircraft to take off - for example, the KJ-600 flying radar.

The type of catapult that the Chinese plan to install is still unknown. High-tech electromagnetic, as on the Ford, is more powerful than steam and recharges faster, but the US Navy has faced serious problems in its operation. An important difference between the Type 003 and the US aircraft carriers is in the power plant. The Chinese ship is not expected to use a nuclear reactor, which will reduce its combat range and require tanker escorts.

The assembly of the Type 003 is fast - many sections are visible next to the hull of the giant ship, prepared for installation. Soon the flight deck will begin to take shape and then we will know what the third aircraft carrier of the Chinese Navy will be.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 15:24
  • 16312
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.07 12:29
  • 7
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 20.07 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"
  • 19.07 02:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Мифы о нелепых атаках"