Войти

American "Freedom" and "Independence" were too expensive

2055
0
0
Image source: Фото: James R. Evans / U.S Navy

Coastal warships of the Freedom ("Freedom") and Independence ("Independence") types») The US Navy is proving too expensive, writes Defense News.

The American publication notes that the annual cost of operating one ship created under the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program costs $ 70 million, while the same figure for much larger and more powerful destroyers of the Arleigh Burke type is 81 million.

The US Navy proposes to solve the problem of Freedom and Independence by reducing the number of contractors engaged in ship maintenance and transferring their tasks to the fleet.

Defense News recalls that some LCS ships have problems with the power plant.

So, back in January, the publication wrote that the world's largest military-industrial company, the American Lockheed Martin, stopped supplying the US Navy with coastal warships of the Freedom type. According to the publication, the reason for the temporary suspension of deliveries was a design flaw in the transmission of the ship's propulsion system, in the development of which the German company Renk took part.

In October 2020, Defense News reported that the Detroit - class Freedom ship broke down while off the coast of South America due to engine problems.

The line of LCS ships designed to patrol the coastal zone, combat surface and underwater enemy forces, counter drones and reconnaissance, includes ships of the Freedom and Independence types. The first, which is a high-speed monohull ship, developed by Lockheed Martin. The second is a trimaran (three-hull ship), created by General Dynamics.


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.06 01:41
  • 1
Why are Russian satellites better for their Starlink
  • 18.06 23:57
  • 16096
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 18.06 16:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "Журналист рассказал о «свинцовом облаке» для защиты ядерных ракет"
  • 18.06 16:09
  • 1138
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 18.06 05:40
  • 1
The military commander called for strikes on bridges and the elimination of the leadership of Ukraine
  • 18.06 02:12
  • 0
О Черноморском флоте в ходе СВО. Ценность, участие, потери.
  • 17.06 19:15
  • 0
Ответ на вопрос о целесообразности модернизаций ПЛА в Dzen'е
  • 17.06 17:24
  • 11
Запад готовится к превентивным ударам по базам ВМФ России, заявил Патрушев
  • 17.06 09:54
  • 1
НАСА профинансирует создание спутника-инспектора
  • 17.06 06:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Польша приостановила передачу советских истребителей МиГ-29 Украине"
  • 17.06 05:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "У России предостаточно баллистических ракет. Украина не знает, как их остановить (The New York Times, США)"
  • 17.06 04:50
  • 0
Комментарий к "Эрих Вад о конфликте на Украине: "Это мясорубка, как Верден в 1916 году" (Berliner Zeitung, Германия)"
  • 16.06 23:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Киев хочет получить $20 млрд, чтобы заставить Россию "гореть" (Politico, США)"
  • 16.06 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "Игнат: ЗРК Patriot сумели перехватить меньше половины российской баллистики"
  • 16.06 15:59
  • 1
Игнат: ЗРК Patriot сумели перехватить меньше половины российской баллистики