Войти

The famous BMO-T flamethrower combat vehicle can become a good heavy armored personnel carrier

1932
0
0

Image source: Photo: Bulletin of Mordovia

In Russia, the BMO-T flamethrower combat vehicle has long been created on the T-72 platform, which with minimal modifications could become a heavy armored personnel carrier. It is known that this model, which has solid tank armor, with its own crew of two people can take on board 7 more motorized infantry.

By the way, the BMP-2 has the same landing force. Apart from the two machine gunners located in front of the BMP-3, 5 fighters can fit behind the turret. The BMD-4M has a capacity of only 7 people, of which three are crew. The wheeled BTR-82A also has 7 troops.

Image source: Photo: Bulletin of Mordovia

As for the BMO-T, when they write about its capacity, they mention that three dozen (!) RPO-A "Bumblebee" manual rocket infantry flamethrowers are also placed inside, which can probably be disposed of in the armored personnel carrier version.

Armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles with rear-mounted engines are usually criticized for complicated disembarkation. Fighters participating in a special military operation have long solved this problem - on their armored self-made vehicles, which are created on the basis of tanks, a kind of slide is installed in the stern, from which the infantryman does not experience difficulties.

Image source: Photo: Bulletin of Mordovia

Additional protection for such a means of delivering personnel will be multi-layered "barbecues", electronic warfare equipment, smoke grenade launchers, as well as remote-controlled machine guns.

Lev Romanov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.03 21:34
  • 15041
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.03 21:11
  • 2
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 15:14
  • 707
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 19.03 11:57
  • 1
Persuasion Strike: Contrary to US statements, Iran continues to attack
  • 19.03 11:51
  • 2
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 19.03 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали оружие для удара по кораблям Китая"
  • 19.03 00:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35"