Войти

Western press: MT-LB with an anti-tank gun has disadvantages

1746
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Recently, another MT-LB armored vehicle armed with a 100 mm MT-12 Rapier anti-tank gun was seen equipping Russian troops. Western observers have already dubbed this "hybrid" MT-LB-12, as it has repeatedly met on the front lines of both sides of the conflict.

As indicated in the Western press, this improvised self-propelled howitzer can fire ATGM 9M117 (Knuckles complex) and high-explosive shells, including from closed positions, at a maximum range of 8,200 meters (mounted fire).

The Rapier entered service in 1970. The MT-12K modification, introduced in 1981, was able to launch ATGMs, which allowed missiles to penetrate armor up to 600 mm thick.

MT-12 is actively used by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the Armed Forces of Ukraine for both defensive and offensive purposes. The placement of the gun on the MT-LB increases its mobility and allows you to move over rough terrain due to the use of this high-terrain tractor as a platform.

Image source: topwar.ru

However, the MT-LB-12 system has a number of notable disadvantages. The tractor's light armor provides minimal protection even from small arms, not to mention anti-tank weapons, and the lack of mine protection increases the risks for the crew.

The design of the vehicle, designed to transport troops in cramped conditions, limits the space for the placement of calculations and ammunition. The Rapier has small vertical aiming angles and is characterized by significant recoil when firing.

In general, the use of MT-LB-12 reflects the specifics of modern conflicts, during which outdated equipment is being repurposed to meet growing operational needs

- it is said in the Western press.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 11.04 21:36
  • 0
Комментарий к "США возвращаются к авиации 4 поколения. Почему? Разбираемся в проблеме"
  • 11.04 20:03
  • 2
The ships went: the frigate Admiral Grigorovich took two of our tankers through the English Channel
  • 11.04 19:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Алжирский Су-57 впервые показали на качественном снимке"
  • 11.04 17:56
  • 1052
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 11.04 17:07
  • 15494
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 10.04 19:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ад разверзся: Зеленский взмолился о пощаде. Русские только вошли во вкус"
  • 10.04 18:49
  • 1
The structural collapse of NATO is the result of separation from reality (The Spectator, UK)
  • 10.04 17:35
  • 0
Комментарий на взгляд из 2021 г. (Чжунго цзюньван (Китай): США и Россия «демонстрируют друг другу» асимметричную боевую мощь)
  • 10.04 11:19
  • 1
Чжунго цзюньван (Китай): США и Россия «демонстрируют друг другу» асимметричную боевую мощь
  • 10.04 06:11
  • 0
Что может быть в случае возможного (но еще не "решенного") "военного отступления" Трампа в Иране.
  • 10.04 05:12
  • 4
В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35
  • 10.04 05:07
  • 0
Комментарий к "Новые противокорабельные ракеты помогают Киеву бить по российской территории"
  • 10.04 04:46
  • 0
Комментарий к "Под чужим «ядерным зонтиком»: цена безопасности"
  • 10.04 02:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35"
  • 09.04 20:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российский ЗРК С-400 "Триумф" — головная боль НАТО (The National Interest, США)"