Войти

The promised APU M1A1Abrams from Australia are worse than the T-72B3M, T-80BVM and T-90M

2074
0
0

Image source: Photo: "Bravery2004"

The Australian military promised the APU the supply of 49 pieces of M1A1. These tanks were operated in kangaroo country from 2007 to this year. There were 59 units in total. Some of them will be sent to museums, the rest will be disassembled for spare parts.

In terms of their condition, these Abrams are worse than those currently available to the formations of the Kiev regime. They have exhausted their resources, and they do not have remotely controlled 12.7mm installations installed on the roofs of the towers. Most likely, they will be patched up by Australian mechanics somehow, and it is unclear how long it will take.

Image source: Photo: "Bravery2004"

It is very likely that the Ukrainian side will ask for additional protection in the form of "reactive" armor, lattice anti-cumulative screens and anti-drone "barbecues".

But even in such a modified form, these M1A1s will be inferior to the Russian T-72B3, T-80BVM and even more so the T-90M.

Image source: Photo: "Bravery2004"

Our vehicles have more powerful multi-layered armor, dynamic protection, capable of withstanding hits not only from cumulative ammunition, but also from sub-caliber projectiles. 125 mm guns provide the use of guided missile weapons. In addition, Abrams is initially overweight, which will necessarily affect its cross-country ability. Therefore, the Australian "gifts" will burn even more often than even the current samples available to the APU.

Lev Romanov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 04.07 06:43
К темам "«Ответ на 40-дневную операцию Зеленского». Россия нанесла самый сильный удар по Киеву" и "В Кремле рассказали о практически ежедневных встречах Путина и Герасимова"
  • 04.07 05:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Стоило ли СССР прощать врагов после Великой Отечественной войны?"
  • 04.07 04:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Министр обороны Германии заявил о переломной фазе украинского конфликта"
  • 03.07 18:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО"
  • 03.07 15:17
  • 60
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 03.07 01:42
  • 1
В США рассказали о новой роли Су-57
  • 03.07 01:32
  • 1
FT: Европа хочет использовать оборонный потенциал Турции на фоне разлада с США
  • 02.07 15:09
  • 16223
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.07 12:08
  • 4
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 02.07 05:07
  • 1
Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО
  • 01.07 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)