Войти

The US Air Force is demanding to develop a new long-range ERAM bomb for "Ukrainian" fighters

1268
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

JDAM Satellite-guided bomb

On July 10, 2024, the US Air Force set the defense industry the task of creating a new air-based weapon of destruction, which received the designation ERAM ("extended-range strike munition"). As indicated, Ukraine should become the recipient of these weapons.

ERAM will be crucial to enhance Ukraine's ability to use fighter jets effectively and ensure massive arms shipments through mass production.

- the Air Force document says.

The new munition must have a mass of 500 pounds (227 kg), a range of at least 250 nautical miles (463 km), a flight speed of at least Mach 0.6 and a high-explosive fragmentation warhead. The accuracy should be at least 10 meters (at least in 50% of cases), despite the setting of strong electromagnetic interference by the enemy. The list of requirements includes equipping the means of destruction with a navigation system capable of operating in conditions of deterioration in the quality of the GPS signal.

Image source: topwar.ru

JDAM satellite-guided bombs

The contractor is obliged to produce more than 1,000 shells within 24 months from the date of conclusion of the contract.

ERAM will be the next step in the evolution of guided munitions based on the Mark 82 free fall bomb. Judging by the requirements of the US Air Force, the two main advantages of the new weapon of destruction in comparison with its predecessors should be the range and resistance to the effects of Russian electronic warfare systems, which sharply reduced the effectiveness of the use of satellite-guided ammunition by the Armed Forces.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"