For the first time, the Russian Armed Forces destroyed the American M1 Abrams main battle tank (MBT). TASS — about the tank, its use and another unsuccessful debut of a representative of the Western design school in a special operation in Ukraine
What tanks did Kiev get and how did Abrams burn
Abrams appeared in Ukraine at the end of September 2023. This was preceded by the unsuccessful use of other Western-style heavy armored vehicles during the counteroffensive that began on June 4, 2023. The Russian Defense Ministry has repeatedly reported on the defeat of Leopard family tanks, British Challenger tanks and French heavy armored vehicles AMX-10 RC, which are called wheeled tanks due to the wheeled chassis and 105 mm cannon. In the case of the Briton, this was the first loss of a vehicle of this type during combat operations in the entire history of the tank. Experts had no doubt that the same fate awaits any military equipment sent to Ukraine.
For the first time, the Abrams tank was seen near the front line on February 25. This happened northwest of Avdiivka, which shortly before that came under the full control of the Russian army, and then cleared of the remnants of Ukrainian nationalist formations. On February 26, the governor of the Kherson region, Vladimir Saldo, said that soldiers of the 15th separate motorized rifle brigade of the Russian Armed Forces destroyed the Abrams, despite the presence of additional dynamic protection. Footage of the moment when the tank and the burning armored vehicle were hit quickly spread on social networks. At the same time, users report that the Instagram social network (owned by Meta Corporation, recognized as extremist in the Russian Federation) blocks videos showing the hit "Abrams", with the wording "violation of the rules of use, protection of the image and business reputation of the company." The next day, the destruction was confirmed by the Russian military department.
An overrated tank
M1 Abrams is the main battle tank of the US Armed Forces. The combat weight, depending on the modification and configuration, is 54-66.8 tons. The main armament of the M1A1 modification supplied to Kiev is the 120 mm smoothbore M256 cannon (a similar gun is installed on the German Leopards-2). The crew consists of four people, the engine is a gas turbine with a capacity of 1.5 thousand hp. At the same time, the United States mainly uses a more modern modification of the Abrams tank with improved characteristics — the M1A2. It is distinguished by improved sighting devices and reinforced armor.
According to open source data, the Abrams were used by the United States during the Persian Gulf War (1991), during the Iraq War (2003-2011), and the Afghan campaign (2001-2021). Armored vehicles were used by Saudi Arabia during the conflict in Yemen.
 |
| The downed M1 Abrams tank, Baghdad, Iraq, 2005. |
| Source: AP Photo/ Khalid Mohammed |
An expert in the field of armored vehicles, candidate of military sciences, reserve Colonel Sergei Suvorov, in an interview with TASS, called the shortcomings and vulnerabilities of the heavy "American". So, during the fighting in Iraq, the Abrams were repeatedly hit by a 100 mm armor-piercing shell of an outdated T-55 tank. There have been cases of Abrams being hit by automatic BMP guns: both Bradley and our BMP-2," the specialist said. In addition, according to him, the American MBT was hit by long-ago decommissioned shells from the T-72 tank and RPG-7 hand-held anti-tank grenade launchers. Some of the units are covered with armor, which is penetrated by large-caliber machine guns, which causes a fire and loss of the car. According to the expert, in the event of a duel with modern Russian T-72 and T-90 tanks, Abrams will not have a chance to emerge victorious. In particular, domestic vehicles will be able to use an anti-tank guided missile launched through the barrel of a gun, while its range of destruction exceeds the range of a shot from an American MBT gun.
The vulnerability of "Abrams" was also noted by Western publications. An independent analytical publication from the United States, Military Watch Magazine, in September last year expressed the opinion that the American tank is equal or inferior in booking to the Leopard in the 2A6 modification, and is also seriously inferior to the British Challenger. In addition, the Abrams supplied to Ukraine, due to fears of technology leakage, are deprived of depleted uranium armor. Forbes magazine pointed to the weak reservation of the "Americans" in the upper and side projections, nevertheless calling the tanks supplied to Ukraine one of the most protected in the world. "An FPV drone, even with an old anti-tank charge, can penetrate this place, killing or injuring a crew member," the article says.
According to Suvorov, Abrams also has operational disadvantages: the complexity of repairs, the need to refuel with clean aviation kerosene, the use of filters prone to clogging in the air supply system. The expert said that in Iraq, during the movement, the tank filters had to be cleaned every 15 minutes. In the case of Ukraine, this limits the use of the tank in the summer.
Due to the lack of an automatic loader, the rate of fire of the Abrams will drop after the first three or four shots. At the same time, the ergonomics of the American car's workspace is worse than that of the German Leopard.
Officials and experts reacted to the destruction of the first American heavily armored "gift". The press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov, answering a question from TASS, said that Russia destroys Abrams tanks in the area of its defense in the same way as all other tanks. The press service of Rostec State Corporation believes that the destruction of the armored vehicle dispelled the myth of its invulnerability. Columnist Peter Suciu, in an article on the website of the American magazine The National Interest, expressed the opinion that the potential of this tank is greatly overestimated. And although the armored vehicle is among the best in the world of MBT, it should not be considered as an invincible miracle weapon.
How to destroy Abrams?
"Our PTS (anti—tank weapons - approx. TASS) acted as they should act, because they were developed in the USSR and then in Russia just to destroy all these enemy tanks, which they destroy in Ukraine," Suvorov commented earlier on the failed Ukrainian counteroffensive, in which Kiev lost German and British tanks. "They just confirmed their high efficiency and that they created them correctly!"
The expert named almost the entire arsenal of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation as a means of countering Western-style tanks. One of the threats to armored vehicles is the vast minefields of millions of ammunition exposed by Russian sappers. Kamikaze drones - both heavy long—range Lancets and compact short-range FPV drones - have made a great contribution to reducing the number of foreign tanks in the area of their defense. Domestic anti-tank missile systems (ATGMs) of various types are designed specifically to defeat tanks. According to open sources, the British Challenger was destroyed from the Kornet ATGM. It is noteworthy that the website of the United Kingdom Ground Forces continues to claim that not a single vehicle of this type was destroyed during the fighting, however, keeping silent about the supply of tanks to Ukraine.
 |
| Photo: TASS/Alexey Konovalov. |
| Source: iz.ru |
Russian artillery also effectively destroys enemy armored vehicles using barrel and rocket artillery with unguided and adjustable ammunition. Thus, a guided artillery shell of the Krasnopol family is capable of hitting a tank from the first shot, while the ammunition is aimed at the target by an advanced gunner or an Orlan-30 type drone, highlighting it with a laser beam from a distance of several kilometers.
The army aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces is also successfully fighting against foreign tanks transferred to Kiev. Spectacular footage of the destruction of armored vehicles by Ka-52 and Mi-28 attack helicopters has been repeatedly demonstrated by the Russian Ministry of Defense.
Ground- and air-based anti-tank missiles have a tandem warhead that is capable of piercing armor, even if dynamic protection (DZ) is installed in front of it, destroying the cumulative jet of ammunition. This makes it pointless to additionally equip the Abrams with DZ modules.
"We waited a long time, finally we waited. [Our] fighters were preparing, they were instructed, they all have memos — what, how, where to shoot," Sergei Suvorov noted in an interview with TASS, commenting on the destroyed Abrams. — The fighters are prepared. He (the Abrams tank — approx. TASS) has arrived, they have been waiting for him for a long time, since September. Naturally, they will all be there [such a fate] — "Leopards" expected, "Challengers", "Abrams" the same thing."
Victor Bodrov