Войти

SpaceX called the explosion of both Starship stages a success

1772
0
0

SpaceX Starship

The second attempt to launch the Starship spacecraft into space was again unsuccessful, but SpaceX representatives interpret this launch as a significant achievement. They are right in their own way - the thorny path of space exploration consists entirely of mistakes and the search for ways to correct them. For example, this time the launch pad remained intact, whereas at the last launch, a heavy-duty torch from 33 Raptor engines made a huge hole in the concrete and scattered debris for many kilometers.

It is also considered a success that the Starship ship normally separated from the Falcon Super Heavy Booster launch vehicle, since it was not possible to do this last time. Moreover, for the first time engineers managed to put into practice an innovative "hot separation" of the steps. Alas, after that, the launch vehicle encountered an unknown system failure and it failed to restart its engines to return to Earth. In order to avoid risks, the command to self-destruct the rocket was given after 20 seconds.

SpaceX Starship

The main module, the Starship spacecraft, successfully continued its flight and entered the orbital trajectory. He almost reached the border with space, but in the sixth minute of the flight, communication with the device was lost. According to the official version, it collapsed due to an unknown reason, the debris fell into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. SpaceX is currently collecting telemetry data and analyzing launch details. The mission was recognized as successful, as it was possible to implement the key conditions – the safe separation of the stages and the launch of the Starship itself into orbit. He still had to get off it and land in the Hawaii area after 90 minutes of flight, so the loss of the device is not considered a failure.

Alexander Martynenko

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
  • The news mentions
Страны
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.07 18:44
  • 16316
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.07 13:27
  • 4
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 12:49
  • 1
Greetings to Odessa: Russia has begun to completely isolate Ukraine from the Black Sea
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"