Войти

Armor like plywood: how a Russian FPV drone broke through the roof of a NATO armored personnel carrier

2503
1
0

Image Source: Photo: MKFI, Bravery2004

NATO countries, as a rule, supply the armed forces of the Kiev regime with outdated models of wheeled armored personnel carriers, which bear heavy losses from various means of destruction of the Russian army.

As noted by "RG: Russian weapons" , recently a Finnish-made XA-180 Pasi armored personnel carrier of the 36th Brigade of the Navy Marines came under attack by our FPV drone.

As a result, an impressive break was formed in the front of the roof. There is no data on whether there were militants in the department of management at that moment, but if they were there, then everything could end very sadly for them.

It is also unknown how seriously the internal equipment was damaged. In any case, eliminating all the consequences will result in a serious expenditure of time and effort.

Image Source: Photo: MKFI, Bravery2004

This is not the first such armored personnel carrier lost by the armed formations of the Kiev puppet regime. In total, they lost about a dozen "one hundred and eighties". One of the captured cars became an exhibit of the Patriot park near Moscow.

XA-180s are considered obsolete models, they have weak armor, poor mine protection, and they cannot provide effective fire support to infantry.

An unknown number of such means of transportation were delivered to Ukraine a year ago. In addition, Finland supplies the AFU with small arms and anti-tank weapons, various types of artillery systems, ammunition for them, as well as armored vehicles, including heavy mine clearance vehicles based on Leopard 2 main battle tanks.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Comments [1]
№1
31.10.2023 12:12
"Броня как фанера ... "
И чего тут на костях пляски устраивать? У любой бронетехники любой страны крыша тонкая. Нет ничего нового в факте пробоя крыши.
Нельзя везде быть "толстым". Не уедет никуда.
А вот выводы надо делать! А где в статье выводы? Нету!
Пустая статья.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 13.04 11:29
  • 1070
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 13.04 11:23
  • 1
Ядерный дрон «Посейдон» заставил США усомниться в своем оружии
  • 13.04 11:18
  • 1
Why didn't the British Navy decide to stop Putin's frigates in the English Channel? (The Telegraph UK, United Kingdom)
  • 13.04 10:43
  • 15511
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 13.04 10:28
  • 1
NASA laser technology in the Artemis II mission
  • 13.04 10:18
  • 2
Летные испытания самолета Як-130М продлятся до 2028 года
  • 13.04 06:31
  • 1
Удар по базе США в Кувейте нанесли не дроны, а два Су-24 с иранскими пилотами
  • 13.04 03:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Возрождение Третьего Рейха, или сатанинские* звезды над Германией…"
  • 13.04 02:08
  • 1
На Украине показали БЭК-авианосец
  • 13.04 01:53
  • 1
Trump lost his temper and snapped at Rutte over NATO's inaction on Iran (Politico, USA)
  • 13.04 01:38
  • 1
The ice has broken, or a naughty pet from the Baltic States
  • 12.04 19:45
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Пока не возьмем на абордаж, не успокоятся». Запад готовит тотальную морскую блокаду России"
  • 12.04 07:58
  • 1
Что необходимо самолетам 5 и 6-го поколений без учета малозаметности. И какие страны в этом впереди.
  • 12.04 02:38
  • 0
Каковы перспективы боевой авиации без "малозаметности".
  • 12.04 02:08
  • 1
Комментарий к "США возвращаются к авиации 4 поколения. Почему? Разбираемся в проблеме"