Войти

A military expert explained the absence of a ban on depleted uranium shells

1447
0
0
Image source: Spc. Joshua Taeckens/Zuma/ТАСС

Not only the civilian population suffers from the use of depleted uranium shells, but also the military using this type of weapons. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) refused to ban these shells and did not take into account the reports provided. About this "Tape.<url>" was told by military expert Alexey Leonkov.

"Cases of the consequences of the use of depleted uranium shells have been witnessed," Leonkov explained. — For example, in Yugoslavia, in Iraq, there was an infection of the area. When uranium gets into the soil, it can also get into water, into plant organisms. When a person gets inside this ecosystem, the activation of chronic diseases begins. First of all, oncology."

According to the military expert, attempts to classify depleted uranium shells as chemical weapons and prohibit their use have already been made, but this required WHO approval. Unfortunately, the organization refused to take into account the reports of researchers who pointed out the severe consequences for the civilian population.

The problem also turned out to be that the consequences of depleted uranium shells were delayed, respectively, the connection with weapons is much more difficult to prove.

"So when the United States, Great Britain declare that there is nothing terrible in these munitions, they are, of course, lying. After all, not only civilians, but also tank crews who received oncological diseases suffered from their use in a number of regions. It is clear that they did not arise out of the blue. But it was not possible to prove the connection with depleted uranium," Leonkov concluded.

Earlier it was reported that the White House is going to provide Kiev with depleted uranium tank shells. They can be equipped with Abrams tanks, which will also be sent to Ukraine.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 17.03 22:02
  • 628
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 17.03 21:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО усиливает патрулирование в Арктике. Главная цель — обнаружить российские подлодки, пока они не ушли на глубину (Business Insider, Германия)"
  • 17.03 21:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Может ли НАТО разместить ядерное оружие в Финляндии? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 17.03 19:46
  • 15020
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 17.03 19:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране"
  • 17.03 18:49
  • 2
США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране
  • 17.03 18:31
  • 1
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 17.03 17:04
  • 0
Польша между двух огней
  • 17.03 13:48
  • 1
Полковник перечислил самое мощное оружие России в зоне СВО
  • 17.03 09:42
  • 1
Робот-кентавр из Китая поможет переносить тяжелые грузы, радикально снижая нагрузку на человека
  • 17.03 09:26
  • 1
Во Франции обеспокоились российскими ракетами
  • 17.03 02:59
  • 1
NATO is stepping up its patrols in the Arctic. The main goal is to detect Russian submarines before they go deep (Business Insider, Germany)
  • 17.03 02:34
  • 1
Эксперт Ивлев: ВПК найдет решение проблемы господства беспилотников на поле боя
  • 17.03 02:18
  • 1
Donald Trump warned that NATO faces a "very bleak future" if the allies do not help the United States in Iran (Financial Times, UK)
  • 17.03 01:46
  • 1
Насколько опасен US Navy - точнее, его АУГ в разных океанах - для СГ РФ&РБ?