Войти

Why did the APU not install "reactive armor" on Leopard 2A4 tanks

1840
0
0

Image source: Photo: TG-channel bmpd

An attempt to install dynamic protection on German-made Leopard 2A4 tanks supplied by NATO countries to Ukraine failed. In any case, on all combat vehicles of this model, photos of which have recently appeared on the Web, there is no such additional "reactive armor".According to "RG: Russian weapons", a few months ago it became known that one of the samples that had just been received by the AFU tried to hang the "Contact-1" developed during the Soviet Union.

Its containers were attached both to the frontal part of the hull and to the front of the tower. Perhaps it was supposed to place additional protection on the sides. [...]

The fact is that the Leopard 2A4, created almost forty years ago, currently has big problems with resistance to modern cumulative ammunition. For example, according to some estimates, it is practically defenseless against existing anti-tank guided missiles with a penetration of 900-1000 mm.

However, the tank, plastered with such "boxes", gained several tons in weight, which did not have a very good effect on the mobility characteristics.

At one time, the Turkish military faced a similar problem, having lost a dozen units of such equipment in Syria, hit mainly by not the most modern ATGM "Fagot" and "Competition". As a matter of urgency, they tried to strengthen the tracked vehicles with their own versions of similar protection, adding more sets of lattice screens to them. During the tests at the test site, it turned out that the tank upgraded in this way loses a lot in patency and in the ability to overcome various obstacles.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 12.02 04:48
  • 14176
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 12.02 04:48
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром Беларуси представляет ударный беспилотный комплекс нового поколения "Квадро-М"
  • 12.02 04:46
  • 1571
Корпорация "Иркут" до конца 2018 года поставит ВКС РФ более 30 истребителей Су-30СМ
  • 12.02 01:53
  • 1
The Limits of Russian-Ukrainian-American negotiations (Stratfor, USA)
  • 12.02 01:46
  • 0
По поводу направлений совершенствования тактической авиации РФ.
  • 12.02 00:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Линкор класса "Трамп" против "Адмирала Нахимова" (The National Interest, США)"
  • 11.02 22:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США оценили «морских терминаторов» из России"
  • 11.02 21:46
  • 1
Вершина диванно-искпердного идиотизма. Комментировать не буду - наслаждайтесь. :)
  • 11.02 21:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали главную характеристику Ту-160М"
  • 11.02 20:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Технологии против массы»: бундесвер сравнил истребители - свои и противника"
  • 11.02 19:29
  • 11
Пашинян рассказал о результатах выхода Армении из ОДКБ
  • 11.02 18:00
  • 68
"To break through island chains." China has given a powerful response to the Pentagon
  • 11.02 17:28
  • 2
The next master of Europe? What is the threat of Germany's new power (Foreign Affairs, USA)
  • 11.02 16:13
  • 2
Кто управляет прошлым?
  • 10.02 22:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Следующий хозяин Европы? Чем грозит новая мощь Германии (Foreign Affairs, США)"