Войти

Why did the APU not install "reactive armor" on Leopard 2A4 tanks

1867
0
0

Image source: Photo: TG-channel bmpd

An attempt to install dynamic protection on German-made Leopard 2A4 tanks supplied by NATO countries to Ukraine failed. In any case, on all combat vehicles of this model, photos of which have recently appeared on the Web, there is no such additional "reactive armor".According to "RG: Russian weapons", a few months ago it became known that one of the samples that had just been received by the AFU tried to hang the "Contact-1" developed during the Soviet Union.

Its containers were attached both to the frontal part of the hull and to the front of the tower. Perhaps it was supposed to place additional protection on the sides. [...]

The fact is that the Leopard 2A4, created almost forty years ago, currently has big problems with resistance to modern cumulative ammunition. For example, according to some estimates, it is practically defenseless against existing anti-tank guided missiles with a penetration of 900-1000 mm.

However, the tank, plastered with such "boxes", gained several tons in weight, which did not have a very good effect on the mobility characteristics.

At one time, the Turkish military faced a similar problem, having lost a dozen units of such equipment in Syria, hit mainly by not the most modern ATGM "Fagot" and "Competition". As a matter of urgency, they tried to strengthen the tracked vehicles with their own versions of similar protection, adding more sets of lattice screens to them. During the tests at the test site, it turned out that the tank upgraded in this way loses a lot in patency and in the ability to overcome various obstacles.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.03 03:27
  • 14802
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 05.03 03:20
  • 202
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 05.03 03:13
  • 3
В США рассказали о мести Ирану за повреждение авианосца
  • 04.03 23:19
  • 1
"Where are Khamenei's aircraft?" Why are US bombers flying freely over Iran
  • 04.03 18:56
  • 2
Reactive response: the new missile brigade will protect the Northwest
  • 04.03 15:16
  • 1
Trump: America has unlimited stocks of weapons and can fight forever
  • 04.03 06:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "В войне с Ираном США учли уроки конфликта на Украине"
  • 04.03 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Новейшая ракета Х-38МЛ в ходе СВО стала сокрушителем укреплений и переправ"
  • 04.03 03:50
  • 1
"Revolution and a new era in air defense": France received the first SAMP/T NG air defense system
  • 04.03 02:54
  • 0
Комментарии к "Опасность проблемной ракеты Sentinel для России оценили", и к "Раскрыта опасность новых американских ракет Sentinel для России"
  • 04.03 01:37
  • 1
Неожиданное прекращение ударов «Томагавками» по Ирану объяснили
  • 04.03 01:20
  • 1
Путин поручил сделать эффективнее систему ценообразования Минобороны
  • 03.03 23:31
  • 1
США в Иране впервые ударили «уничтожителем» российских С-400
  • 03.03 23:03
  • 0
Комментарий к ""Российские «Вербы» в Иране признали бесполезными против США, и к "В Польше заявили о победе над российской «Вербой»"
  • 03.03 21:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США заявили о невозможности потопления американских авианосцев"