Войти

Australian Submarines: expectation and reality

1145
0
0

Illustrative image

Image source: topwar.ru

It became known that on Monday, US President Joe Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak aboard the Missouri nuclear submarine in San Diego will announce the equipping of Australia with new nuclear submarines as part of the AUKUS alliance, a trilateral defense partnership aimed at countering China in its, according to the US authorities, "the desire to achieve naval dominance in the Pacific Ocean."

The new submarines are expected to join the Australian Navy in 2032. The first batch will be American multipurpose submarines of the Virginia type - Australia will purchase up to 5 submarines worth about $ 4 billion each. Then British boats will be adopted, which are still being developed - this type of submarine will be called SSN-AUKUS and will be a further development of the current Astute type. The first deliveries will take place in the 2040s.

Everything is fine in this news, except that there is no specifics. How will additional Virginias be built if American shipyards already cannot withstand a very "tight" schedule of construction, maintenance and repair of their own submarines? Operation of two different types of submarines at once, if you believe the statements. Which will require additional training of specialists in the operation of British equipment. And the training of a highly qualified submariner, in terms of complexity and cost, is not much inferior to the training of a pilot. And finally, the question of creating a new naval base for nuclear submarines remains open.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.07 09:25
  • 1
Europe is making a big mistake (The New York Times, USA)
  • 02.07 09:11
  • 1
The "Five Percent" NATO oath: a Pyrrhic victory for a dependent Europe? (19FortyFive, USA)
  • 02.07 09:00
  • 1
Что впереди - Т-90М(n), Т-14, или Т-100?
  • 02.07 08:51
  • 1
Drones of the Armed Forces of Ukraine attacked a defense enterprise in Izhevsk about 1300 km from Ukraine
  • 02.07 08:48
  • 1092
Израиль "готовился не к той войне" — и оказался уязвим перед ХАМАС
  • 02.07 02:48
  • 1
Ответ на "Первая партия "Абрамсов" для Украины полностью уничтожена: следующая уже в Польше и ожидает доставки на фронт (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.07 00:37
  • 0
Ответ на "Разнородные силы ТОФ нанесли ракетный удар по морской цели"
  • 01.07 23:06
  • 0
Ответ на "«Не соответствуют современным требованиям»: На Западе признали низкую эффективность ЗРК Patriot против российских ракет"
  • 01.07 22:42
  • 0
Ответ на "Финская наводка: самолеты НАТО отработали прорыв системы ПВО России"
  • 01.07 11:46
  • 9533
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.07 09:42
  • 78
Россия использует пропаганду как средство войны против Запада - британский генерал
  • 01.07 08:31
  • 1
Ответ на "Всемирное Смутное время: хочет ли в действительности Европа воевать - Мнения ТАСС"
  • 01.07 06:57
  • 2
Vietnam received the third American Hamilton-class patrol ship
  • 30.06 20:41
  • 2
Проблемному российскому самолету сменили конструктора
  • 30.06 19:13
  • 0
Ответ на "Су-35 отложат про запас"