Войти

The Australian authorities have confirmed that by March 2023 they will determine plans for submarines within the framework of the AUKUS alliance

1757
0
0
Image source: google.com

TSAMTO, June 29. According to the statement of the Australian Minister of Defense Richard Marles, the new Australian government has confirmed that by March 2023 it must approve a program for the creation of a fleet of submarines with the United Kingdom and the United States.

As RIA Novosti notes, in May in Australia, the Labor party led by the current Prime Minister Anthony Albanese won the election, supporting the course of the former government of Scott Morrison on the development of a fleet of nuclear submarines within the framework of the AUKUS alliance. The specifics were supposed to be outlined by March next year.

According to R. Marles, by that time it will be clearer when Australia receives nuclear submarines, what their potential will be, how to solve the problem with personnel.

"When we came to power, there was a process of determining what exactly would be the next step, what future submarines would be. I am sure that we will have an answer within the established framework," the minister said.

As RIA Novosti reminds, in mid-September 2021, Australia signed a deal with the United Kingdom and the United States in the field of defense and security under the new AUKUS partnership and announced its withdrawal from the agreement with the French company Naval Group for the supply of 12 submarines worth 56 billion. euro.

The new Prime Minister E. Albanese expressed confidence that he would be able to normalize relations with France, which were shaken after the rejection of French submarines. He promised that France would be compensated in the amount of 555 million euros for the termination of the contract.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"