Войти

The British press discusses the "deadly" features of the Russian Tu-22M3 bomber

2056
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The British tabloid The Sun called the upgraded version of our Tu-22M3 strategic bomber "deadly". The authors of the article write that this aircraft poses a serious danger to Western countries, as it is capable of carrying up to 24 tons of bombs and covering a distance of about 7 thousand kilometers.

As a matter of fact, its name according to the NATO classification speaks eloquently about what our bomber is for the West. In the alliance, the Tu-22M3 is designated as a Backfire, which in Russian means "to have unpleasant consequences."

Experts emphasize that even if we do not take into account nuclear missiles, the armament of our aircraft is capable of inflicting truly monstrous damage to the enemy. In particular, the article mentions the FAB-250 and FAB-1500 bombs with high-explosive warhead.

According to Western experts, despite the fact that these munitions were created back in Soviet times and are considered very outdated by modern standards, they have extraordinary destructive power.

In addition, the Backfire can carry a wide variety of missile weapons, including anti-ship X-22 and hypersonic "Daggers".

However, the most alarming thing for Western experts is that our bomber, which develops a speed of over Mach 2, is able to cover a distance of about 7 thousand kilometers. Consequently, not only the whole of Europe, but also the east coast of the USA falls into the zone of destruction of the "deadly" Tu-22M3.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.07 06:25
  • 1
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 15:24
  • 16312
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"
  • 19.07 02:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Мифы о нелепых атаках"