Войти

The British press discusses the "deadly" features of the Russian Tu-22M3 bomber

2074
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The British tabloid The Sun called the upgraded version of our Tu-22M3 strategic bomber "deadly". The authors of the article write that this aircraft poses a serious danger to Western countries, as it is capable of carrying up to 24 tons of bombs and covering a distance of about 7 thousand kilometers.

As a matter of fact, its name according to the NATO classification speaks eloquently about what our bomber is for the West. In the alliance, the Tu-22M3 is designated as a Backfire, which in Russian means "to have unpleasant consequences."

Experts emphasize that even if we do not take into account nuclear missiles, the armament of our aircraft is capable of inflicting truly monstrous damage to the enemy. In particular, the article mentions the FAB-250 and FAB-1500 bombs with high-explosive warhead.

According to Western experts, despite the fact that these munitions were created back in Soviet times and are considered very outdated by modern standards, they have extraordinary destructive power.

In addition, the Backfire can carry a wide variety of missile weapons, including anti-ship X-22 and hypersonic "Daggers".

However, the most alarming thing for Western experts is that our bomber, which develops a speed of over Mach 2, is able to cover a distance of about 7 thousand kilometers. Consequently, not only the whole of Europe, but also the east coast of the USA falls into the zone of destruction of the "deadly" Tu-22M3.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.08 06:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Карл Маркс: философия, революции и геополитика — почему его идеи актуальны до сих пор"
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 04.08 04:40
  • 16353
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.08 01:30
  • 1
Комментарий к "Голодомор. Ложь и факты"
  • 04.08 01:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Нравственный вакуум: Может ли атеизм обосновать добро? Христианство как опора человечности"
  • 04.08 00:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Города-предатели, встречавшие немцев как освободителей"
  • 03.08 23:00
  • 1
Solidly built: how do mobile firing groups work on the Tigers
  • 03.08 22:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Красная Армия не смогла прорвать линию Маннергейма три месяца"