Войти

"Destroying HIMARS and MRLS in Ukraine is a critically important task for Russia"

3782
2
0
Image source: Wikimedia Commons/Global Look Press

Colonel Khodarenok explained how to deal with American MLRS in Ukraine

This week, the United States officially announced the delivery of multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) M142 HIMARS to Ukraine. The United Kingdom announced the supply of MLRS M270 MRLS, also of American production. Military observer of the Newspaper.En" Mikhail Khodarenok figured out what means of countering these systems the Russian army has.

The new package of American military assistance to Ukraine includes air defense radars, counter-battery radars, Mi-17 helicopters, cars, anti-tank weapons, artillery ammunition, as well as MLRS M142 HIMARS. The cost of the entire package of military assistance is $700 million.

Special attention in this package should be paid to HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System), which is a highly mobile universal rocket and artillery system for operational and tactical purposes. The system is developed on the basis of a 5-ton FMTV wheeled chassis.

The decision of President Joe Biden to supply HIMARS to Ukraine actually gave the go-ahead for the re-export of these systems to the member states of the North Atlantic Alliance. Following the United States, the United Kingdom announced the sending of M270 MLRS multiple launch rocket systems to Kiev, saying that it had already "agreed this decision with the Americans."

The M270 MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System) is also a universal launcher. It is mounted on the caterpillar base of the American Bradley platform. By and large, MLRS is a heavy version of HIMARS.

There are two types of ammunition for both MLRS and HIMARS.

Firstly, these are MFOMS (MLRS Family of Munitions), which are unguided and guided missiles (missiles). Their nomenclature is very extensive, the firing range ranges from 40 to 80 km.

Secondly, these are AFOM type ammunition (Army TACMS Family of Munitions), which include several types of tactical ballistic missiles. The firing range of these products ranges from 165 to 300 km. And according to some reports, even up to 400 km. The question of the supply of AFOM itself is still open. There is no official data on this.

The M270 MLRS is in service with 17 countries around the world, most of which are part of the so-called "contact group on Ukraine". It is noteworthy that Poland sent a request to the United States for the purchase of a large batch of M270 MLRS. With a high degree of probability, this means that a significant part of this batch is re-export for the APU.

Thus, the MLRS to Ukraine will be carried out through Poland according to the "Danish version". Recall that during the second meeting of the "contact group on Ukraine" at Ramstein Airbase, it was decided that Denmark would transfer modern RGM-84 "Harpoon" anti-ship missiles to Ukraine.

As a result, the developer and manufacturer of RGM-84 "Harpoon" - the United States - cannot be formally charged against Moscow.

Modern Russian anti-aircraft missile systems such as S-400, S-350, S-300PM2, Buk air defense systems have the potential of non-strategic missile defense. They have the ability to defeat any American MLRS ammunition.

The subtlety lies in the fact that the anti-aircraft missiles of these complexes are significantly more expensive than the M142 and M270 missiles themselves, and their mass use in this capacity will be extremely costly.

Another way to combat MLRS is their defeat by tactical aircraft. However, in this case, the aircraft must either be on duty in the air or at the airfield. The time interval between receiving intelligence information about the location of the MLRS and setting combat missions to aircraft crews should be as short as possible. Immediately after the launch, MLRS and HIMARS leave the firing position.

In addition, to combat the M270 and M142, Russian MLRS of the Smerch type should be involved, whose range is 120 km, that is, it exceeds the capabilities of American MLRS if they use standard rockets rather than tactical missiles.

Finally, it is necessary to take all possible measures to ensure that the M142 and M270, in principle, do not fall on the line of combat contact, that is, to strike communications on the territory of Ukraine - railway loading and unloading stations, bridges and tunnels, traction substations.

Such strikes can be carried out with the help of sea- and air-based cruise missiles, as well as with all possible aviation means of destruction.

Destroying MLRS from the United States in Ukraine is a critically important task for Russia. Only a comprehensive application of all means of combating systems such as M142 and M270 can give the desired effect for the Russian Armed Forces.

The opinion of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.

Biography of the author:

Mikhail Mikhailovich Khodarenok is a military columnist for the newspaper.Ru", retired colonel.

He graduated from the Minsk Higher Engineering Anti-Aircraft Missile School (1976), the Military Air Defense Command Academy (1986).

Commander of the S-75 anti-aircraft missile division (1980-1983).

Deputy Commander of the anti-aircraft missile regiment (1986-1988).

Senior Officer of the General Staff of the Air Defense Forces (1988-1992).

Officer of the Main Operational Directorate of the General Staff (1992-2000).

Graduated from the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia (1998).

Columnist of "Nezavisimaya Gazeta" (2000-2003), editor-in-chief of the newspaper "Military-Industrial Courier" (2010-2015).


Mikhail Khodarenok

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [2]
№1
06.06.2022 15:33
Для обнаружения Хаймарсов и МЛРСов требуется подтянуть воздушных разведчиков. Например, на базе Ил-22ПП Порубщик. Не говоря об А-50У.
0
Inform
№2
07.06.2022 07:56
Цитата, Тектор сообщ. №1
А-50У
Никто не станет расходовать ресурс малочисленных и дорогостоящих А-50 в интересах контрбатарейной борьбы. О чем Вы? У нас угроза НАТО на носу. Их главная роль - это обеспечение работы тактической авиации ВКС. Последние ведь не висят в воздухе непрерывно, вот и с СДРЛО тоже самое. Даже ещё в большей степени, т.к. их гораздо меньше. А именно непрерывное слежение требуется для эффективной КББ.
Любые другие задачи, СДРЛО будут выполнять лишь эпизодически и попутно.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 23.05 07:35
  • 2
Затулин сообщил, что Кубань полностью обеспечена средствами для отражения атак БПЛА
  • 23.05 07:33
  • 2
Конгрессмены США добиваются разрешения на использование Киевом американского оружия для ударов по стратегическим объектам РФ
  • 23.05 06:06
  • 0
Авиация vs ПВО/ПРО.
  • 23.05 04:57
  • 1285
Корпорация "Иркут" до конца 2018 года поставит ВКС РФ более 30 истребителей Су-30СМ
  • 23.05 03:46
  • 1
Основатель американской ЧВК: если бы РФ заключила альянс с Мексикой, США бы это не понравилось
  • 23.05 03:25
  • 1
Заместитель генсека НАТО заявил, что у альянса нет намерения направлять солдат на Украину
  • 23.05 01:30
  • 0
О БМП, и о тяжелых БМП.
  • 23.05 00:14
  • 1522
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.05 21:26
  • 5
Тяжелые БМП на базе танков с "царь-мангалами" спасут жизни наших бойцов
  • 22.05 20:19
  • 2
Для Черноморского флота разрабатывают тепловизионный комплекс для борьбы с надводными дронами
  • 22.05 19:38
  • 0
Еще раз о роли танков на поле боя - в связи с новациями в российском танкостроении
  • 22.05 18:28
  • 0
О необходимости для России создания ПТРК 3-го поколения.
  • 22.05 08:44
  • 2
Rostec will begin to "grow" large-sized parts for the new PD-35 aircraft engine
  • 22.05 01:21
  • 1
The relationship between Xi Jinping and Putin is built on conscience (Financial Times, UK)
  • 21.05 19:40
  • 2
What to expect from Putin in his second six-year presidential term (Fox News, USA)