Войти

19FortyFive dispelled myths about the Russian army

2227
0
0
Image source: Алексей Никольский/РИА Новости

It is a big mistake to stick to stereotypes about the Soviet and Russian armed forces during the World Wars, the Cold War or the 90s. Armies are constantly changing, based on historical experience and the material component.

The columnist 19FortyFive writes about this Sebastian Roblin. He tried to debunk the most common myths about the Russian army.

The first stereotype is that the Russian army is outdated and incompetent: This was proved by the events in Chechnya in 1994-1995. In reality, the armed forces have significantly transformed in response to the events in Chechnya, South Ossetia and Syria. According to the observer, the use of high-precision weapons and unmanned vehicles allowed Russia to reduce military losses.

The second myth says that Russia always relies on the numerical superiority of its troops. The origins of this stereotype originate in the events of the Second World War, the author emphasizes.

Now the Russian army is focusing on contactless wars, the observer writes, when high-precision strikes play a leading role, and not a mechanized assault. This is reflected, among other things, in the principles of combat formation: tanks and infantry keep at a distance until the missiles do most of the work.

The third myth is that the Russian army for the most part consists of poorly trained conscripts. The truth is that now the majority of military personnel are contractors who are paid good money, the author concludes.

The fourth stereotype concerns Russia's spending on the defense complex. They say, if we take into account the exchange rates, the Kremlin's military spending is negligible compared to American, so its potential is clearly weaker.

However, the depreciation of the ruble does not affect the price of military equipment, which is produced for Russian needs by local manufacturers. Adjusted for the purchasing power of the ruble within the country, the effectiveness of defense spending in Russia is much higher than it is presented in the Pentagon reports, the observer writes.


Maya Biryukova

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.07 02:14
  • 9542
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 03.07 02:06
  • 5
"An order for hundreds of vehicles is possible": the Slovak Wolf 25 AD armored anti-drone vehicle is being tested in Ukraine
  • 03.07 02:02
  • 1
Ответ на "Утечки раскрыли тайный британский план “потопить весь Черноморский флот” (The Grayzone, США)"
  • 03.07 02:00
  • 1
В России заметили огневую точку с корабельной пушкой
  • 03.07 01:45
  • 1
Russia has issued a harsh ultimatum to Britain: "Openly hostile!" (Daily Express, UK)
  • 03.07 00:33
  • 1
В США оценили создающую проблемы для НАТО ракету России
  • 03.07 00:26
  • 1
Short bursts: new Kalashnikov assault rifles are being tested in the free zone
  • 03.07 00:03
  • 1
Bad news for NATO: Russia has a stockpile of Oreshnik missiles (infoBRICS, China)
  • 02.07 23:55
  • 1
Promising American Blackbeard GL rocket
  • 02.07 23:38
  • 1
Intellectual abilities of top military commanders
  • 02.07 23:25
  • 1
"Total collapse." What are the weaknesses in Ukraine's defense?
  • 02.07 23:14
  • 1
В зону СВО поступили плащи для маскировки бойцов
  • 02.07 21:35
  • 1096
Израиль "готовился не к той войне" — и оказался уязвим перед ХАМАС
  • 02.07 21:18
  • 0
Ответ на "В США впечатлились российским «всевидящим монстром»"
  • 02.07 19:10
  • 487
Претензии к администрации сайта