Войти

The "Ford" aircraft carrier of the USA is the most expensive, but toothless

2924
0
0
Image source: vpk-news.ru

The combat systems of the newest and most expensive US Navy ship, the $13 billion Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier, "have yet to show that they can effectively" protect the ship from anti-ship missiles and other threats.

This information is contained in a new report by Pentagon experts. Bloomberg journalists got acquainted with it even before the official release of the document.

As follows from the experts' report, even though the sensor systems "satisfactorily detected, tracked targets and pointed at them," the ability to destroy training targets was limited due to the not very successful operation of interceptors, radars and data transmission systems. 

In addition, experts say, the reliability of the aircraft carrier's descent and lifting systems is "bad or unknown at all," and recent stress tests have identified previously unknown shortcomings. Finally, according to experts, some indicators have already been identified to ensure the survival of the ship, which can be increased. 

The ship is being built by Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. by order of the US Navy, Kommersant writes.

According to analysts, the report significantly undermined the hope of the Navy leadership that the aircraft carrier could be demonstrated as an example of a new class of nuclear aircraft carriers that could spread the power of the American Navy to the entire planet and become a more combat-ready, reliable and more affordable alternative to Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, which Ford should replace. In addition, the first combat launch at sea, scheduled for mid-September, is also in question.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.03 11:03
  • 14760
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.03 05:46
  • 163
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 02.03 01:41
  • 1
В связи с происходящим: комментарий на "Сначала выведут из строя ПРО Москвы: Готов план удара по России. В ответ – ядерный взрыв у берегов Британии?"
  • 01.03 22:08
  • 0
По поводу "СВОЕВРЕМЕННЫЕ СПОРЫ"
  • 01.03 07:47
  • 0
Не в тему сайта, но все-таки не совсем off-top. Комментарий к "Почему в России хоккей честнее и сильнее футбола?"
  • 01.03 01:23
  • 1
Комментарий к "Рютте: НАТО нужно увеличить мощность ПВО в пять раз"
  • 28.02 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вмятины на атомных подлодках ВМФ России объяснили"
  • 28.02 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США ужаснулись Ирану в «безвыходном положении»"
  • 28.02 15:48
  • 1
The Russian 350nm photolithograph was estimated at 500 million rubles.
  • 28.02 07:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Запад растранжирил годы, которые нам пожертвовала Украина (The Times, Великобритания)"
  • 27.02 11:45
  • 1
Forget about Greenland: Russia has already settled on this Arctic island of NATO (The Wall Street Journal, USA)
  • 27.02 09:07
  • 102
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 27.02 07:24
  • 1
В США оценили крупнейшие танковые силы в мире
  • 27.02 06:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "США обозначили угрозу с воздуха в будущем"
  • 27.02 02:15
  • 1
The United States has identified a threat from the air in the future