Войти

The "Ford" aircraft carrier of the USA is the most expensive, but toothless

3371
0
0
Image source: vpk-news.ru

The combat systems of the newest and most expensive US Navy ship, the $13 billion Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier, "have yet to show that they can effectively" protect the ship from anti-ship missiles and other threats.

This information is contained in a new report by Pentagon experts. Bloomberg journalists got acquainted with it even before the official release of the document.

As follows from the experts' report, even though the sensor systems "satisfactorily detected, tracked targets and pointed at them," the ability to destroy training targets was limited due to the not very successful operation of interceptors, radars and data transmission systems. 

In addition, experts say, the reliability of the aircraft carrier's descent and lifting systems is "bad or unknown at all," and recent stress tests have identified previously unknown shortcomings. Finally, according to experts, some indicators have already been identified to ensure the survival of the ship, which can be increased. 

The ship is being built by Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. by order of the US Navy, Kommersant writes.

According to analysts, the report significantly undermined the hope of the Navy leadership that the aircraft carrier could be demonstrated as an example of a new class of nuclear aircraft carriers that could spread the power of the American Navy to the entire planet and become a more combat-ready, reliable and more affordable alternative to Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, which Ford should replace. In addition, the first combat launch at sea, scheduled for mid-September, is also in question.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 06.08 16:13
Комментарий к "Чем тактическое ядерное оружие отличается от простой ядерной бомбы? И будет ли его применения считаться началом атомной войны?"
  • 06.08 16:07
  • 3
Индия отказалась от покупки российского истребителя пятого поколения
  • 06.08 15:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "Для Европы я вижу два сценария"
  • 06.08 14:23
  • 16361
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 06.08 08:00
  • 78
CEO of UAC Slyusar: SSJ New tests with Russian engines will begin in the fall - TASS interview
  • 05.08 17:38
  • 0
Внутриполитическая конъюнктура растоптала «европейские ценности»
  • 05.08 06:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Карл Маркс: философия, революции и геополитика — почему его идеи актуальны до сих пор"
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)