Войти

The "Ford" aircraft carrier of the USA is the most expensive, but toothless

2225
0
0
Image source: vpk-news.ru

The combat systems of the newest and most expensive US Navy ship, the $13 billion Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier, "have yet to show that they can effectively" protect the ship from anti-ship missiles and other threats.

This information is contained in a new report by Pentagon experts. Bloomberg journalists got acquainted with it even before the official release of the document.

As follows from the experts' report, even though the sensor systems "satisfactorily detected, tracked targets and pointed at them," the ability to destroy training targets was limited due to the not very successful operation of interceptors, radars and data transmission systems. 

In addition, experts say, the reliability of the aircraft carrier's descent and lifting systems is "bad or unknown at all," and recent stress tests have identified previously unknown shortcomings. Finally, according to experts, some indicators have already been identified to ensure the survival of the ship, which can be increased. 

The ship is being built by Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. by order of the US Navy, Kommersant writes.

According to analysts, the report significantly undermined the hope of the Navy leadership that the aircraft carrier could be demonstrated as an example of a new class of nuclear aircraft carriers that could spread the power of the American Navy to the entire planet and become a more combat-ready, reliable and more affordable alternative to Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, which Ford should replace. In addition, the first combat launch at sea, scheduled for mid-September, is also in question.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 29.04 04:09
  • 0
Ответ на "Курская операция: разгром противника и ближайшие перспективы - Мнения ТАСС"
  • 29.04 03:13
  • 8689
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 29.04 03:05
  • 4
A military simulator has demonstrated an ominous scenario of Russian missiles attacking Britain, destroying military bases and Royal Air Force fighter jets (The Sun, UK)
  • 29.04 01:23
  • 1
Мишустин: СВО усилила развитие инноваций в технологиях
  • 29.04 01:10
  • 5
Источник: в результате теракта в Брянской области погиб ключевой разработчик РЭБ «Красуха»
  • 28.04 22:33
  • 0
Прекрасный пример УБОЖЕСТВА "мышления" искпердов-аналитегов.
  • 28.04 20:54
  • 0
Ответ на "Крепость Россия: как НАТО может противостоять стратегии A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 28.04 18:44
  • 0
Ответ на ""Маршем дойти до Владивостока". Как может выглядеть война России и Европы"
  • 28.04 16:09
  • 3
Китай стал мировым лидером по мощности атомных станций
  • 28.04 15:40
  • 1
Какие сигналы посылает Россия признанием НГШ Валерием Герасимовым участия военнослужащих КНДР в освобождении Курской области
  • 28.04 14:14
  • 1
БПЛА для Беларуси – запас карман не тянет!
  • 28.04 13:27
  • 2
Эксперт Степанов: Пхеньян проявил себя как реальный союзник в курской операции
  • 28.04 06:23
  • 7
КНДР ратифицировала договор о стратегическом партнерстве с Россией - ЦТАК
  • 28.04 05:05
  • 23
Генерал-майора Ивана Попова приговорили к пяти годам колонии общего режима и лишили звания
  • 28.04 02:20
  • 1
Russia has more than doubled production of Su-34 fighter-bombers — another batch has been delivered (Military Watch Magazine, USA)