Войти

Why were 2S9 "Nona-S" amphibious self-propelled guns introduced into Grozny in January 95

4418
0
0

Image source: Photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Recently, interest in the wars in Chechnya has reawakened. However, there are many inconsistencies about the use of various military equipment in urban battles. For example, the need to introduce 2S9 "Nona-S" self-propelled artillery installations into Grozny is questioned. Say, why were they needed there?

The fact is that 120-mm self-propelled guns are armed not just with a gun, but with a universal cannon-howitzer-mortar and therefore can fire direct fire, including cumulative and high-explosive shells.

If necessary, it is possible to hit the enemy behind the buildings with mines with significant destructive capabilities.

Of course, the armor of these self-propelled guns is too thin, but the Airborne Forces did not have heavily armored vehicles at all before the appearance of T-72B3 tanks, such is the specificity of these troops.

By the way, not everyone knows, but when the appearance of future tank support combat vehicles was being worked out in Chelyabinsk in the mid-80s, an option based on the T-72B with a 120-mm low-ballistics gun was considered, which would be very useful in operations like Grozny. However, everything was limited only to the production of the layout.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 23.05 10:48
  • 4
Путин рассказал, чем пополнится состав ВМС и ВКС
  • 23.05 08:15
  • 4
The project of the TVRS-44 Ladoga aircraft has been suspended
  • 23.05 07:40
  • 120
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 22.05 22:49
  • 2
Europe's Backup Plan: NATO without America (The Economist, UK)
  • 22.05 20:47
  • 15868
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.05 19:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Умрем же, сограждане, за Украину!» Почему ядерного ответа НАТО не будет"
  • 22.05 11:51
  • 1
Shoulder straps will be put on Ladoga civil aircraft
  • 22.05 10:36
  • 1
"Let's die, fellow citizens, for Ukraine!" Why there will be no NATO nuclear response
  • 22.05 10:30
  • 1
Charges on "Daggers" and "dream machine". Putin and Lukashenko held a nuclear forces training
  • 22.05 10:24
  • 2
НАТО уличили в противодействии российскому ядерному «Посейдону»
  • 22.05 10:16
  • 1
Минобороны показало полет МиГ-31 с "Кинжалом" со спецбоевой частью
  • 22.05 09:29
  • 1
SpaceX published its financial statements for the first time and turned out to be deeply unprofitable
  • 22.05 05:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "США вернули еще один списанный бомбардировщик B-1B. Почему американские ВВС начал "воскрешать" устаревшую списанную технику"
  • 22.05 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему даже старый советский РКГ-3 оказался опасен для “непобедимой” “Меркавы”"
  • 22.05 00:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Самая дорогая игрушка Пентагона: 15 миллиардов за штуку"