Войти

Why were 2S9 "Nona-S" amphibious self-propelled guns introduced into Grozny in January 95

4416
0
0

Image source: Photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Recently, interest in the wars in Chechnya has reawakened. However, there are many inconsistencies about the use of various military equipment in urban battles. For example, the need to introduce 2S9 "Nona-S" self-propelled artillery installations into Grozny is questioned. Say, why were they needed there?

The fact is that 120-mm self-propelled guns are armed not just with a gun, but with a universal cannon-howitzer-mortar and therefore can fire direct fire, including cumulative and high-explosive shells.

If necessary, it is possible to hit the enemy behind the buildings with mines with significant destructive capabilities.

Of course, the armor of these self-propelled guns is too thin, but the Airborne Forces did not have heavily armored vehicles at all before the appearance of T-72B3 tanks, such is the specificity of these troops.

By the way, not everyone knows, but when the appearance of future tank support combat vehicles was being worked out in Chelyabinsk in the mid-80s, an option based on the T-72B with a 120-mm low-ballistics gun was considered, which would be very useful in operations like Grozny. However, everything was limited only to the production of the layout.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.05 09:29
  • 1
SpaceX published its financial statements for the first time and turned out to be deeply unprofitable
  • 22.05 07:24
  • 15853
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.05 05:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "США вернули еще один списанный бомбардировщик B-1B. Почему американские ВВС начал "воскрешать" устаревшую списанную технику"
  • 22.05 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему даже старый советский РКГ-3 оказался опасен для “непобедимой” “Меркавы”"
  • 22.05 02:39
  • 1
Europe's Backup Plan: NATO without America (The Economist, UK)
  • 22.05 00:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Самая дорогая игрушка Пентагона: 15 миллиардов за штуку"
  • 21.05 17:04
  • 0
Стенания Зеленского
  • 21.05 16:49
  • 0
«Народная дипломатия» и вполне официальные лица
  • 21.05 02:52
  • 1
Киев применит для перехвата «Гераней» над Днепром БЭКи с дронами
  • 20.05 18:57
  • 1
Why do you need a two-seat version of the Su-57?
  • 20.05 16:41
  • 1
ГУР МО Украины: Россия делает ставку на реактивные «Герани»
  • 20.05 06:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Европейская дилемма: как обеспечить безопасность баллистических ракет большой дальности, которые Трамп отказывается поставлять (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 20.05 01:44
  • 1
Ровер компании Astrolab поищет на Луне гелий-3. И оценит уровень своей запыленности
  • 20.05 01:31
  • 1
The European dilemma: How to ensure the safety of long-range ballistic missiles that Trump refuses to supply (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 20.05 00:52
  • 2
Су-57 заметили с комплексом 101КС-Н