Войти

Why were 2S9 "Nona-S" amphibious self-propelled guns introduced into Grozny in January 95

4212
0
0

Image source: Photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Recently, interest in the wars in Chechnya has reawakened. However, there are many inconsistencies about the use of various military equipment in urban battles. For example, the need to introduce 2S9 "Nona-S" self-propelled artillery installations into Grozny is questioned. Say, why were they needed there?

The fact is that 120-mm self-propelled guns are armed not just with a gun, but with a universal cannon-howitzer-mortar and therefore can fire direct fire, including cumulative and high-explosive shells.

If necessary, it is possible to hit the enemy behind the buildings with mines with significant destructive capabilities.

Of course, the armor of these self-propelled guns is too thin, but the Airborne Forces did not have heavily armored vehicles at all before the appearance of T-72B3 tanks, such is the specificity of these troops.

By the way, not everyone knows, but when the appearance of future tank support combat vehicles was being worked out in Chelyabinsk in the mid-80s, an option based on the T-72B with a 120-mm low-ballistics gun was considered, which would be very useful in operations like Grozny. However, everything was limited only to the production of the layout.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.03 07:12
  • 110
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 01.03 04:59
  • 14748
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.03 03:33
  • 0
В связи с происходящим: комментарий на "Сначала выведут из строя ПРО Москвы: Готов план удара по России. В ответ – ядерный взрыв у берегов Британии?"
  • 01.03 01:23
  • 1
Комментарий к "Рютте: НАТО нужно увеличить мощность ПВО в пять раз"
  • 28.02 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вмятины на атомных подлодках ВМФ России объяснили"
  • 28.02 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США ужаснулись Ирану в «безвыходном положении»"
  • 28.02 15:48
  • 1
The Russian 350nm photolithograph was estimated at 500 million rubles.
  • 28.02 07:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Запад растранжирил годы, которые нам пожертвовала Украина (The Times, Великобритания)"
  • 27.02 11:45
  • 1
Forget about Greenland: Russia has already settled on this Arctic island of NATO (The Wall Street Journal, USA)
  • 27.02 09:07
  • 102
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 27.02 07:24
  • 1
В США оценили крупнейшие танковые силы в мире
  • 27.02 06:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "США обозначили угрозу с воздуха в будущем"
  • 27.02 02:15
  • 1
The United States has identified a threat from the air in the future
  • 27.02 00:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российский Су-57 обвинили в изменении баланса сил в «подбрюшье НАТО»"
  • 26.02 23:35
  • 1
Комментарий к "Четыре года СВО: уроки и выводы"