Войти

The colonel of the US Air Force recognized the effectiveness of the Russian "Shell"

2707
0
0
Image source: Фото: Алексей Куденко / РИА Новости

Modern integrated air defense systems are capable of hitting approaching cruise missiles and other guided munitions, writes the director of the program on future concepts and military potential assessments of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, Colonel of the Air Force (Air Force) USA retired Mark Ganzinger.

The expert recognized the effectiveness of the Russian complexes "Tor", "Tunguska", "Pantsir" and Chinese systems based on them against low-flying target aircraft, cruise missiles, anti-radar missiles and bombs. "These short-range weapons are fully integrated with electronic warfare systems and long-range anti-aircraft missile systems," the author assures.

In July, Ganzinger, in an article for Defense News, predicted NATO's defeat in the war with Russia and China and explained the reasons for this phenomenon. In his opinion, the Pentagon has chosen the wrong strategy for the development of the armed forces. The expert expressed confidence that the United States would not have the strength to repel an attack by an equal opponent, protect the country and deter a nuclear strike. According to him, success in the war with Russia and China requires a strong army capable of attacking deep into enemy territory and delivering large-scale and accurate strikes.


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.08 02:17
Комментарий к "Смена нынешней идеологической повестки: от либерализма к монархизму и плачу о "потерянной России""
  • 21.08 01:17
  • 1
Зеленский пожаловался на «подорожание войны»
  • 20.08 21:28
  • 16384
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.08 20:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему САУ PzH 2000 в два раза мощнее Т-90М в современных конфликтах"
  • 20.08 05:09
  • 0
Комментарий к " "Нет значимых результатов" или почему боевое применение русских танков не правильно оценивают американские СМИ?"
  • 20.08 03:06
  • 2
Ответ на пост участника с ником "Иван Иванович" - кратко ответить в ветке не получается. :)
  • 19.08 20:37
  • 344
Космонавтика Илона Маска
  • 19.08 20:31
  • 2
Putin teases NATO with a warship with hypersonic missiles on board (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 19.08 14:28
  • 2
The first full-time carrier of 6 megaton Poseidons on trial
  • 19.08 12:40
  • 1
"Field artillery of the future": AS9 Huntsman self-propelled guns entered the Australian Army
  • 19.08 10:49
  • 2
В России приступили к сборке первых самолетов Як-130М
  • 19.08 10:42
  • 1
Russia: Britain will pay for the drones transferred to Ukraine (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 19.08 08:05
  • 1
Economists have calculated how much SpaceX has turned the earth's cosmonautics upside down
  • 19.08 07:06
  • 3
Garage creative
  • 19.08 03:55
  • 0
Комментарий к "Путин дразнит НАТО военным кораблем с гиперзвуковыми ракетами на борту (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"