Войти

The colonel of the US Air Force recognized the effectiveness of the Russian "Shell"

2121
0
0
Image source: Фото: Алексей Куденко / РИА Новости

Modern integrated air defense systems are capable of hitting approaching cruise missiles and other guided munitions, writes the director of the program on future concepts and military potential assessments of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, Colonel of the Air Force (Air Force) USA retired Mark Ganzinger.

The expert recognized the effectiveness of the Russian complexes "Tor", "Tunguska", "Pantsir" and Chinese systems based on them against low-flying target aircraft, cruise missiles, anti-radar missiles and bombs. "These short-range weapons are fully integrated with electronic warfare systems and long-range anti-aircraft missile systems," the author assures.

In July, Ganzinger, in an article for Defense News, predicted NATO's defeat in the war with Russia and China and explained the reasons for this phenomenon. In his opinion, the Pentagon has chosen the wrong strategy for the development of the armed forces. The expert expressed confidence that the United States would not have the strength to repel an attack by an equal opponent, protect the country and deter a nuclear strike. According to him, success in the war with Russia and China requires a strong army capable of attacking deep into enemy territory and delivering large-scale and accurate strikes.


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 30.04 00:08
  • 8706
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 29.04 22:57
  • 8
A military simulator has demonstrated an ominous scenario of Russian missiles attacking Britain, destroying military bases and Royal Air Force fighter jets (The Sun, UK)
  • 29.04 21:43
  • 0
Ответ на "Польша раскрывает свои планы по превращению в мощную военную державу (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 29.04 20:56
  • 0
Ответ на "Мирное соглашение Трампа ужасно. Но Украина все равно должна его принять (The Times, Великобритания)"
  • 29.04 20:44
  • 1
Poland reveals its plans to become a powerful military power (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 29.04 19:43
  • 0
Ответ на "Польская пресса: война выявила ограниченную полезность амфибийных свойств бронетехники"
  • 29.04 19:16
  • 0
По поводу "Будущее перемирие: какие территории будут контролировать Украина и Россия (Фокус.ua, Украина)"
  • 29.04 12:33
  • 1
The future truce: which territories will be controlled by Ukraine and Russia (Focus.ua, Ukraine)
  • 29.04 12:28
  • 6
Источник: в результате теракта в Брянской области погиб ключевой разработчик РЭБ «Красуха»
  • 29.04 12:22
  • 2
Мишустин: СВО усилила развитие инноваций в технологиях
  • 29.04 09:38
  • 22
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 29.04 04:09
  • 0
Ответ на "Курская операция: разгром противника и ближайшие перспективы - Мнения ТАСС"
  • 28.04 22:33
  • 0
Прекрасный пример УБОЖЕСТВА "мышления" искпердов-аналитегов.
  • 28.04 20:54
  • 0
Ответ на "Крепость Россия: как НАТО может противостоять стратегии A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 28.04 18:44
  • 0
Ответ на ""Маршем дойти до Владивостока". Как может выглядеть война России и Европы"