Войти

The British put up a barrier against Russian submariners in the F-35 drop zone

Sections: Air, Sea, Global safety
3232
0
0
Image source: vpk-news.ru

The recent disaster in the Mediterranean of the 5th generation F-35 fighter jet, which took off from the British aircraft carrier Queen Elizabeth, caused serious concern in London.

They believe that the secret technologies of the newest American aircraft can get to the Russians.

At the moment, additional forces of the British Navy and NATO countries have been pulled into the area of the fall of the F-35.

An anti-submarine search is being conducted for underwater objects that can approach the aircraft at the bottom.

According to the British military, attempts are being made to prevent the Russians from extracting the wreckage of the fighter from the bottom. The United States is providing invaluable assistance to London in this matter.

"The British Royal Navy has confirmed the crash of the F-35 Lightning II, which took off in the Mediterranean Sea from the aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth. The pilot ejected safely, but the incident provoked hasty attempts to return the plane, which contains a lot of secret equipment. The search for wreckage will be an immediate priority," the Navy Lookout analytical website notes.

"This is necessary both to ensure that confidential technologies and data stored on board do not fall into the wrong hands, and to facilitate any investigation of the causes of the accident. The UK has little capacity to carry out such a mission in the deep waters of the Levantine Sea, the part of the Mediterranean immediately north of Egypt, and reportedly needs commercial assistance. It is necessary to hurry to rescue the crashed Navy fighter from the sea before the Russians get to it," Forbes quotes Free News.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"