Войти

The United States recognized the death of dozens of Syrian civilians as a result of an airstrike in 2019, but justify it - newspaper

Sections: Air, Global safety
2331
0
0
Image source: U.S. AIR FORCE

Washington. November 14th. INTERFAX - The United States has admitted that as a result of the bombing in 2019 of the vicinity of the Syrian city of Baguz, at least 80 people were killed, most of them women and children, but they justify the actions of their military, the New York Times reported.

According to her, on March 18, 2019, an American F-15E attack aircraft dropped two bombs in the Baguz area - first one weighing 500 pounds, then another weighing 2 thousand pounds on a crowd consisting mainly of women and children.

The newspaper noted that the US military, responding to its request about this incident, acknowledged this for the first time. They stated that up to 80 people were killed as a result of the bombing, but claimed that the strike was justified because 16 militants who were in the crowd were destroyed. In addition, they stated that it is unclear whether the rest of the dead were civilians or militants, since women and children in ISIS (Islamic State, a terrorist organization banned in Russia) are known to have taken up arms.

The publication writes that the representative of the US Central Military Command, Bill Urban, said that an internal investigation of this airstrike was conducted.

"We are disgusted by the deaths of innocent people and are taking all possible measures to prevent them. In this particular case, we independently reported and investigated the bombing in accordance with our own evidence and take full responsibility for the unintentional loss of life," he said.

At the same time, the publication says, no real independent investigation has been conducted, although the fact of the death of people as a result of the bombing was reported to the leadership and the Armed Forces Committee of the US Senate by a US Air Force legal officer. He qualified the incident as a war crime.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"