Войти

What damage was received near China by the Connecticut submarine

4634
0
0
Image source: U.S. Navy/Wikimedia.org

Specialists of the US Navy base in Guam, examining a nuclear submarine after an accident in the South China Sea, diagnosed damage to the ship's forward ballast tanks. This was reported to USNI by four knowledgeable sources. The submarine's reactor was not damaged. The condition of the torpedo tubes through which the submarine launches all its weapons - including Tomahawk cruise missiles - is not reported.

It is not yet clear what exactly caused the accident. The US Navy announced the collision of a submarine with an "underwater object", without naming either the location of the emergency or the characteristics of the "object". It is known that the accident occurred during the combat service of the submarine in the South China Sea with a difficult bottom relief. As one of the versions, the collision of a submarine with a sunken vessel is considered, but modern submarines are equipped with equipment that allows them to notice such obstacles in advance.

Chinese experts believe that the submarine's sonar was faulty, since it did not notice such a major obstacle as a sunken ship. However, US Navy veteran Aaron Amik admitted that while sailing off enemy shores (and service in the South China Sea is just one of those) submariners do not use active sonar in order not to give themselves away.

Official Beijing accused Washington of concealing the details of the incident.

"It's a strange way to hide something if you publish a press release about it," retorted Pentagon spokesman John Kirby.

After the diagnosis is completed, the Connecticut submarine will be sent for repair to a shipyard that has a dry dock of the required size. The nearest suitable bases are in Hawaii and Washington State.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 17.09 01:59
  • 1
Europe's defenses are crumbling
  • 16.09 21:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "Путин пригрозил Европе войной, если на Украину будут введены миротворческие войска (The Washington Post, США)"
  • 16.09 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Новое оружие России уже изменило ход СВО. На Западе признали его эффективность и назвали полной неожиданностью для ВСУ"
  • 16.09 19:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украинский след"
  • 16.09 18:20
  • 1
Россия может создать многоразовый лунный аппарат нового типа к 2040 году
  • 16.09 17:49
  • 2
Начальник бронетанкового управления МО РБ: современному танку альтернативы в ближайшей перспективе не будет
  • 16.09 11:03
  • 0
Украинский след
  • 16.09 05:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "От Москвы до Киева: Трамп ведет к миру или новой эскалации? (Al Jazeera, Катар)"
  • 16.09 01:52
  • 1
Russia's new weapons have already changed the course of its military operations. The West recognized its effectiveness and called it a complete surprise for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
  • 16.09 01:27
  • 1
From Moscow to Kiev: Is Trump leading to peace or a new escalation? (Al Jazeera, Qatar)
  • 15.09 20:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Начальник бронетанкового управления МО РБ: современному танку альтернативы в ближайшей перспективе не будет"
  • 15.09 18:26
  • 4
The rapid modernization of the Russian nuclear submarine fleet has alerted NATO (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 15.09 15:43
  • 1
"Fighter" with character: An armored buggy designed for military supply and medical personnel
  • 15.09 14:10
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему танки не устарели из-за дронов и продолжат применяться в будущем?"
  • 15.09 13:13
  • 1
"Rostec": it's time to train pre-engineers