Войти

The US military potential was estimated at three

2430
0
0
Image source: David B. Gleason/Wikipedia

The American Heritage Foundation Research Institute has published an analysis of the US military potential. The assessment turned out to be the worst in recent years.

According to analysts of the institute, the power of the military potential is only 2/3 of what should be in reality. The problem is also a rather outdated technique that does not meet the challenges of the time.

The US Navy received the lowest rating. Experts emphasize that the technological gap between American ships and the fleet of potential opponents is increasing. The quantitative composition does not correspond to the current challenges, auxiliary shipyards are overloaded with various repair work. The financing of the fleet leaves much to be desired.

The army also received a low rating. Many of its modernization programs are still under development, and several more years will pass before modern equipment enters service.

The American Air Force also has problems. Analysts point to both the lack of modern aircraft and the lack of experienced pilots.

Certain types of American troops received good marks: for example, these are the nuclear forces and the Marine Corps. But the overall assessment of analysts of the entire US military potential is "Marginal", which corresponds to a three on a five-point scale.

The institute's experts explain that the United States is able to withstand one major regional conflict. But if the number of them grows to at least two, the Pentagon will not cope with the threat. Rising inflation and public debt lead to the fact that due to a lack of funds for defense, the country risks losing the ability to protect its national interests, analysts warned.


Maya Biryukova

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.07 09:25
  • 1
Europe is making a big mistake (The New York Times, USA)
  • 02.07 09:11
  • 1
The "Five Percent" NATO oath: a Pyrrhic victory for a dependent Europe? (19FortyFive, USA)
  • 02.07 09:00
  • 1
Что впереди - Т-90М(n), Т-14, или Т-100?
  • 02.07 08:51
  • 1
Drones of the Armed Forces of Ukraine attacked a defense enterprise in Izhevsk about 1300 km from Ukraine
  • 02.07 08:48
  • 1092
Израиль "готовился не к той войне" — и оказался уязвим перед ХАМАС
  • 02.07 02:48
  • 1
Ответ на "Первая партия "Абрамсов" для Украины полностью уничтожена: следующая уже в Польше и ожидает доставки на фронт (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.07 00:37
  • 0
Ответ на "Разнородные силы ТОФ нанесли ракетный удар по морской цели"
  • 01.07 23:06
  • 0
Ответ на "«Не соответствуют современным требованиям»: На Западе признали низкую эффективность ЗРК Patriot против российских ракет"
  • 01.07 22:42
  • 0
Ответ на "Финская наводка: самолеты НАТО отработали прорыв системы ПВО России"
  • 01.07 11:46
  • 9533
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.07 09:42
  • 78
Россия использует пропаганду как средство войны против Запада - британский генерал
  • 01.07 08:31
  • 1
Ответ на "Всемирное Смутное время: хочет ли в действительности Европа воевать - Мнения ТАСС"
  • 01.07 06:57
  • 2
Vietnam received the third American Hamilton-class patrol ship
  • 30.06 20:41
  • 2
Проблемному российскому самолету сменили конструктора
  • 30.06 19:13
  • 0
Ответ на "Су-35 отложат про запас"