Войти

The US military potential was estimated at three

3037
0
0
Image source: David B. Gleason/Wikipedia

The American Heritage Foundation Research Institute has published an analysis of the US military potential. The assessment turned out to be the worst in recent years.

According to analysts of the institute, the power of the military potential is only 2/3 of what should be in reality. The problem is also a rather outdated technique that does not meet the challenges of the time.

The US Navy received the lowest rating. Experts emphasize that the technological gap between American ships and the fleet of potential opponents is increasing. The quantitative composition does not correspond to the current challenges, auxiliary shipyards are overloaded with various repair work. The financing of the fleet leaves much to be desired.

The army also received a low rating. Many of its modernization programs are still under development, and several more years will pass before modern equipment enters service.

The American Air Force also has problems. Analysts point to both the lack of modern aircraft and the lack of experienced pilots.

Certain types of American troops received good marks: for example, these are the nuclear forces and the Marine Corps. But the overall assessment of analysts of the entire US military potential is "Marginal", which corresponds to a three on a five-point scale.

The institute's experts explain that the United States is able to withstand one major regional conflict. But if the number of them grows to at least two, the Pentagon will not cope with the threat. Rising inflation and public debt lead to the fact that due to a lack of funds for defense, the country risks losing the ability to protect its national interests, analysts warned.


Maya Biryukova

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 06.08 20:29
  • 0
Комментарий к "Декабристы: герои или мятежники?"
  • 06.08 16:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем тактическое ядерное оружие отличается от простой ядерной бомбы? И будет ли его применения считаться началом атомной войны?"
  • 06.08 16:07
  • 3
Индия отказалась от покупки российского истребителя пятого поколения
  • 06.08 15:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "Для Европы я вижу два сценария"
  • 06.08 14:23
  • 16361
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 06.08 08:00
  • 78
CEO of UAC Slyusar: SSJ New tests with Russian engines will begin in the fall - TASS interview
  • 05.08 17:38
  • 0
Внутриполитическая конъюнктура растоптала «европейские ценности»
  • 05.08 06:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Карл Маркс: философия, революции и геополитика — почему его идеи актуальны до сих пор"
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным