Войти

What is known about North Korean ballistic missiles for submarines

4814
0
0
Image source: rg.ru

In North Korea, work continues on the creation of ballistic missiles for submarines (SLBMs). Last Thursday, it became known about the conduct of new tests of such weapons.

According to military expert Yuri Lyamin, currently only one diesel-electric submarine of the DPRK, which is a carrier of ballistic missiles, is known. This submarine was built in 2014. It was named "8.24 Engun" ("Heroes of August 24th"). In the West, it was designated as Sinpo-B or type Gorae.

Apparently, the experimental ship was specially designed and manufactured for the development of SLBMs. It was from him that the first North Korean Pukkykson-1 SLBM was launched in 2016, and three years later, the Pukkykson-3 large-sized missiles were launched.

Currently, the shipyards of the DPRK are building larger missile submarines, known as Sinpo-C. In the spring of this year, information appeared that work on the lead boat of this project has already been completed. At least, that's what American and South Korean intelligence think.

If we talk about the SLBMs themselves, the maximum range of the Pukkykson-1 is 1200-1300 km, the Pukkykson-3 is already about 1900-2000 km.

Larger SLBMs were also shown at parades, but they have not yet been tested.

As for the new missile launched on October 19, it appears to be a modification of a shorter-range ground-based ballistic missile with the ability to fly along a quasi-ballistic trajectory. This weapon, according to Lyamin, is intended primarily for strikes against targets in South Korea and Japan.


Alexey Moiseev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.01 12:29
  • 12639
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.01 02:14
  • 14
World Time of Troubles: does Europe really want to fight - TASS Opinions
  • 01.01 06:45
  • 16
В России собрались использовать для перевозки пассажиров дирижабли
  • 01.01 05:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Риск самосбывающихся пророчеств: какие угрозы видит российский сенатор"
  • 01.01 00:18
  • 0
О концепции "молниеносного глобального удара (Prompt global strike)"
  • 31.12 22:15
  • 0
О развитии ВМФ РФ
  • 31.12 21:13
  • 0
О "модернизации российской ядерной триады"
  • 31.12 19:49
  • 0
Комментарий к "США предупредили о «ценном активе Путина»"
  • 31.12 07:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "Фатальный провал США скажется на морском соперничестве с Китаем"
  • 31.12 01:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Провал «самого смертоносного истребителя США» оправдали"
  • 30.12 22:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полюбит ли весь мир Су-57 с новым двигателем? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 30.12 20:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российские военные до конца года получат 16 серийных танков "Армата" - газета"