Войти

"Exotic" fragments were found in the lunar soil

2445
0
0
Image source: Фото: Tingshu Wang / Reuters

Scientists from China, Germany and the USA found fragments with an "exotic" chemical composition in the samples of lunar soil delivered by the Chang'e 5 spacecraft. Scientists presented the results of the preliminary soil analysis at the European Congress on Planetary Sciences.

The samples delivered in December 2020 are the youngest ever delivered from the Moon for laboratory analysis: the age of the geological area where the spacecraft landed does not exceed two billion years. 90 percent of the 1.7 kilograms of soil collected by the device most likely originate from the place of its landing on the Earth's satellite - Rümker Peak - and represent lunar marine basalt - "dark" areas of the surface visible from our planet. Among the remaining ten percent are the remains of meteorites and balls of volcanic glass, scientists from the Chinese Geological University say.

Together with colleagues from the Brown and Westphalian Universities, they studied granular inclusions and found that they are identical in composition to materials from the Miran and Sharp canyons - located 230 and 160 kilometers from the site of the lunar mouths of ancient extinct volcanoes. The young age of the rocks also made it possible to narrow down the search for impact craters from which meteorite fragments originate — it turned out that most of them originate from the Harpal crater. Some of the fragments could have been brought to the landing site of the module from a distance of 1300 kilometers.

The Chang'e 5 mission was the first Chinese lunar mission to be returned and the first in 44 years - since the Soviet Luna—24 in 1976 - to deliver samples of lunar soil to Earth. China has become the third country to do this - after the USSR and the USA


Dmitry Yuryev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 15:24
  • 16312
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.07 12:29
  • 7
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 20.07 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"
  • 19.07 02:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Мифы о нелепых атаках"
  • 19.07 01:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "ИХ ПЛАНЫ"
  • 19.07 01:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Александр Зиновьев 21 год воевал с СССР, а вернулся его защищать"
  • 19.07 00:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Бюсты Николая II по всей России — символ возрождения или подготовка к краху"