Войти

The ballistic missile tested by South Korea cannot be an effective means of attack, according to the DPRK

2828
0
0
Image source: © AP Photo, South Korea Defense Ministry via AP

Hong Kong. September 20. INTERFAX-North Korea doubts the effectiveness of a submarine-launched ballistic missile tested by South Korea last week.

"According to the published photos, it has a typical structure and shape of a tactical surface-to - surface ballistic missile (...) and looks like a somewhat clumsy weapon that is far from a submarine-based weapon," KCNA quoted the head of the North Korean defense science agency, Chang Chang Ha, as saying.

In his opinion, the South Korean missile "cannot be an effective means of attack during wars and should not be considered as a threatening weapon with strategic and tactical value."

He noted that if Seoul really tested a submarine-based missile, then this weapon is at the initial stage of development.

The North Korean official said that Pyongyang is closely monitoring South Korea's intentions. He added that such efforts " portend military tensions on the Korean peninsula, increase our awareness and allow us to clearly know what needs to be done."

As reported, last Wednesday, South Korea successfully conducted a test of a submarine-based ballistic missile. According to sources of the South Korean agency "Yonhap", several more rounds of tests will be conducted to ensure the reliability of the missile.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"
  • 02.10 17:40
  • 0
Бадалян: Пашинян проигнорировал саммит ЕАЭС из-за созданного им образа «врага» в лице Лукашенко
  • 02.10 17:34
  • 0
«Это будет другая геополитическая реальность»: в Беларуси жестко предупредили Запад о последствиях провокаций
  • 02.10 03:57
  • 1
Путин поставил кабмину новую задачу в сфере искусственного интеллекта
  • 02.10 03:47
  • 1
Washington has identified the NATO countries it dislikes
  • 01.10 21:10
  • 1
В Ленинградской области испытали новейший боевой лазер для борьбы с БПЛА
  • 01.10 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "China.com (Китай): что делать, когда нет денег? Еще раз продать Китаю самолеты Су"
  • 01.10 16:56
  • 0
«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников