Войти

In what ways do Russian armored personnel carriers lag behind foreign ones, for example, from Ukraine and China

3890
0
0

Image source: Photo: Vestnik Mordovia, KHKBM

Foreign armored personnel carriers, such as the BTR-3, BTR-4 of Ukrainian production or the Chinese ZBL-08, in addition to 30-mm guns, which are clones of Russian guns, are also armed with anti-tank guided missiles.

In the case of equipment from the People's Republic of China, these are far from new HJ-73, in fact, deeply modernized Soviet "Babies", which received semi-automatic control and tandem combat units capable of penetrating armor located behind dynamic protection. Their flight range is 3000 m. Of course, it is difficult to hit a modern tank head-on with their help, but they are quite capable of an armored personnel carrier, BMP, BMD or self-propelled gun. In addition, such ATGMs are very cheap and are manufactured in large quantities. It is expected that they will soon be replaced with something more modern with laser guidance or a third-generation complex operating on the principle of "shot - forgot". The PLA already has such weapons.

Image source: Photo: Vestnik Mordovia, KHKBM

Ukrainian wheeled "three-wheelers" and "four-wheelers" are also equipped with ATGMs, maybe not the most modern, but quite dangerous. The mass-produced "Barrier" has a firing range of 5000 m, and armor penetration is 800 mm, also behind dynamic protection.

As for domestic armored personnel carriers, mass-produced anti-tank weapons are not installed on them, well, unless, of course, you do not take vehicles delivered abroad. For example, in Algeria, "Cornet" was mounted on the BTR-80, which made it possible to destroy the most modern tanks.

Image source: Photo: Vestnik Mordovia, KHKBM

It is known that in Russia, an uninhabited module with ATGM was created for light wheeled armored vehicles. It was even demonstrated a couple of times at the Army forum, but it is not known when this development necessary for the army will be purchased.

Lev Romanov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"
  • 02.10 17:40
  • 0
Бадалян: Пашинян проигнорировал саммит ЕАЭС из-за созданного им образа «врага» в лице Лукашенко
  • 02.10 17:34
  • 0
«Это будет другая геополитическая реальность»: в Беларуси жестко предупредили Запад о последствиях провокаций
  • 02.10 03:57
  • 1
Путин поставил кабмину новую задачу в сфере искусственного интеллекта
  • 02.10 03:47
  • 1
Washington has identified the NATO countries it dislikes
  • 01.10 21:10
  • 1
В Ленинградской области испытали новейший боевой лазер для борьбы с БПЛА
  • 01.10 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "China.com (Китай): что делать, когда нет денег? Еще раз продать Китаю самолеты Су"
  • 01.10 16:56
  • 0
«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников