Войти

The United Kingdom, in case of force majeure, can relocate its nuclear submarines from Scotland to bases in the United States or France

2951
0
0
Image source: © Flickr / Defence Images

TSAMTO, September 2. The UK has prepared an action plan for the transfer of its submarines from bases in Scotland in case the autonomy leaves the kingdom.

This, as RIA Novosti reports, was reported by the Financial Times newspaper, citing competent sources.

According to the publication, one of the possible options involves sending the submarine to the Devonport base (near Plymouth). As the FT notes with reference to the analysis of the Royal Joint Institute for Defense Studies from 2014, such a step could cost 3-4 billion pounds.

The second option of action involves sending submarines to bases in the United States or France. Such a decision, the sources said, would be the least expensive for the treasury, but it could negatively affect the defense sovereignty.

Under the third option, the UK is considering a long-term lease of the current Royal Navy bases in Faslane and Coolport, in which case the kingdom will enter into negotiations with Scotland on granting the bases the status of British overseas territories. This option, according to some representatives of the government, would be the most realistic, the newspaper writes. However, the Scottish National Party supports the withdrawal of the nuclear arsenal from the territory of the region in the event of independence.

At the same time, according to the newspaper, the Ministry of Defense officially stated that they do not plan to move the nuclear arsenal from Scotland.

In early August, the head of the office of the British Prime Minister, Michael Gove, said that the British government would not prevent a new independence referendum in Scotland, if the will of the people is there. In 2014, Scotland voted to keep the region as part of the United Kingdom. The issue of holding a second referendum has been repeatedly raised by the authorities of the region, RIA Novosti notes.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.01 20:18
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 19:50
  • 12611
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.01 02:14
  • 14
World Time of Troubles: does Europe really want to fight - TASS Opinions
  • 01.01 06:45
  • 16
В России собрались использовать для перевозки пассажиров дирижабли
  • 01.01 05:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Риск самосбывающихся пророчеств: какие угрозы видит российский сенатор"
  • 01.01 00:18
  • 0
О концепции "молниеносного глобального удара (Prompt global strike)"
  • 31.12 22:15
  • 0
О развитии ВМФ РФ
  • 31.12 21:13
  • 0
О "модернизации российской ядерной триады"
  • 31.12 19:49
  • 0
Комментарий к "США предупредили о «ценном активе Путина»"
  • 31.12 07:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "Фатальный провал США скажется на морском соперничестве с Китаем"
  • 31.12 01:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Провал «самого смертоносного истребителя США» оправдали"
  • 30.12 22:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полюбит ли весь мир Су-57 с новым двигателем? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 30.12 20:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российские военные до конца года получат 16 серийных танков "Армата" - газета"